Here's my response to a modern Greek from another forum...
Kallimachos wrote:
This is a classic example of how modern Greek propaganda works...its simply a lie by omission. By only telling half of the story, our modern Greek friends are deliberately trying to make an assertion completely opposite to what the ancient historians originally meant to convey. For instance, yes it is true that since the time of Alexander I, the Argead royal family in Macedonia claimed to be 'Greeks' originally from Argos in the Peloponnese, but that is only half of the story. The Argead kings of Macedonia claimed to be 'Greeks' (not Macedonians) from the Pelopennese who had moved north to territory completely outside of Greece to establish themselves as kings over a non-kindred race (the Macedonians). Isocrates tells this story (myth) in full below in his letter to Philip II;
"And the founder of your empire, although he aspired higher than did his fellow citizens and set his heart on a king's power, was not minded to take the same road as others who set out to attain a like ambition. For they endeavored to win this honor by engendering factions, disorder, and bloodshed in their own cities; he, on the other hand, held entirely aloof from Hellenic territory, and set his heart upon occupying the throne of Macedon. For he knew full well that the Hellenes were not accustomed to submit to the rule of one man, while the other races were incapable of ordering their lives without the control of some such power. And so it came about, owing to his unique insight in this regard, that his kingship has proved to be quite set apart from that of the generality of kings: for, because he alone among the Hellenes did not claim the right to rule over a people of kindred race, he alone was able to escape the perils incident to one-man power."
Isocrates., To Philip, 5.106.
Ironically, even if we were to accept the improbable claim that the Argead kings were actually 'Greek's, this still doesn't change the fact that ancient Greeks such as Isocrates continued to consider the general Macedonian population to be non-Greek. For reasons of politics and prestige, it was common for the rulers of various nations in the ancient world to claim descent from other peoples. For instance, if we were to accept the highly improbably Argead claim to be 'Greeks' originally from the Peloponnese, then we must also accept the following impropable claims as well;
The Spartans kings as 'genuine Egyptians'
"...the Dorian Chieftans are pure are genuine Egyptians. This is the accepted Greek version of the Spartan royal house."
Herodotus., The Histories, 6.54.
The Persians kings as 'Greeks'
"We Persians believe we are descended from Perses, whose father was Danae's son Perseus, and whose mother was Andromeda the daughter of Cepheus. Thus we are of the same blood as yourselves, and it would not be right for us to make war upon the people from whom we have sprung."
Herodotus., The Histories, 7.150.
...And the Lycestian Macedonian kings (rivals of the Argeads for the throne of Macedonia), at one stage claimed to be 'Bacciads' (Corinthian Greeks) ruling over a non-Greek people...the Macedonians.
"These people, I say, were not ruled by men of native stock; and the Lyncestae became subject to Arrabaeus, who was of the stock of the Bacchiads."
Strabo., Geography, VII.8.
As you can see, the Argead claim of descent from Argos as well as these other claims have more to do with politics and prestige then reality.
The modern Greeks in their desperation to find 'evidence' of a ancient 'Greek' Macedonian dialect have put forward this inscription as proof that the langauge of the ancient Macedonians was 'Greek'. After all its written in Greek, so the ancient Macedonians must have been 'Greek' right? Unfortunately for our modern Greek friends, this assertion is in direct contradiction to the testimony of numerous ancient historians that the ancient Greeks needed translators to communicate with the ancient Macedonians.
As I wrote before, why is it that evidence of just about every other dialect of ancient Greek has been found on artifacts in Macedonia but not one single trace has ever been found of this elusive 'Greek' Macedonian dialect. Remember, if it was a 'Greek' dialect, then it was so different that both Greeks and Macedonians needed translators for basic communication as evidenced on numerous occasions by the ancient historians. Therefore if this were the case then it would be easy to discover evidence of the elusive dialect, but no trace has ever been found. This fact together with the existence of various Greek dialects being used in Macedonia proves that Greek was a foreign language in the region which was brought into Macedonia as a result of the influence of the various Greek colonies established in Chalcidice as well as Macedonia's proximity to Greece.
Again, the idiotic modern 'Greek' logic, if one speaks Greek, then they must have been 'Greek' right??? This is another modern Greek lie by omission for the simple reason that they forget to mention that ancient Greek had been spoken throughout the mediterranean by numerious different ethnic groups along side their own native languages as an international language of trade and diplomacy for as far back as 700bc (due to the influence of Greek city-state colonisation). If one was to apply the argument that "if a person speaks Greek, then he must be 'Greek'", even further, then the Pelagonians, Thracians, Moesians, Illyrians, Celts, Romans, Jews and numerous other ancient peoples must have all been 'Greek' as well due to the fact that they all had used the Greek language in an official capacity at some stage or another. If this modern 'Greek' argument that "if a person speaks Greek, then he must be 'Greek'", is to be accepted, then we must also accept a similar argument that everybody who uses the internet in English, is a really an 'Englishman'.
The ancient Macedonian elite initially adopted various ancient Greek dialects for reasons of prestige and diplomacy though contact with the ancient Greek colonies in Macedonia such as Olynthos etc. It was only later that Alexander III (the great) adopted the koine as the official administrative language of his multinational, multiracial empire. The ancient Macedonian aristocrat Philotas cleary confirms this fact in a statement during his trial;
"One charge made against me is that I disdain to communicate in my native language, that I have no respect for Macedonian customs (which means I have designs on an empire I dispise). That native language of ours has long been rendered obsolete though our dealings with other nations, and conquerors and conquered alike most learn a foreign tongue."
Quintus Curtius Rufus., The History Of Alexander, Book Six, 23.
Although the ancient Macedonians never wrote in there own langauge, evidence of their language has come down to us today through their typonyms such as;
Bylazora
Doberus
Edessa
Pluinna
Ossa
Stargira
...Again the absurd modern Greek logic that if a person uses Greek, then he must be 'Greek'. If this is the case, then are the following coins and peoples 'Greek' as well???
Armenia - Tigranes II (37-74bc)
Cilicia (31bc)
Judea - Trajan of Sepphoris (82ad)
Moesia (198ad)
Paeonia - Audoleon (315bc)
Phoenicia - Tyre (71ad)
Phrygia - Akmoneia (33bc)
Thrace - Kotys II (57bc)
Scythia - Vonones (75bc)
Etc Etc Etc
Kallimachos wrote:
The entire line of Macedonian kings claimed direct decendancy from Argos in southern Greece.
"And the founder of your empire, although he aspired higher than did his fellow citizens and set his heart on a king's power, was not minded to take the same road as others who set out to attain a like ambition. For they endeavored to win this honor by engendering factions, disorder, and bloodshed in their own cities; he, on the other hand, held entirely aloof from Hellenic territory, and set his heart upon occupying the throne of Macedon. For he knew full well that the Hellenes were not accustomed to submit to the rule of one man, while the other races were incapable of ordering their lives without the control of some such power. And so it came about, owing to his unique insight in this regard, that his kingship has proved to be quite set apart from that of the generality of kings: for, because he alone among the Hellenes did not claim the right to rule over a people of kindred race, he alone was able to escape the perils incident to one-man power."
Isocrates., To Philip, 5.106.
Ironically, even if we were to accept the improbable claim that the Argead kings were actually 'Greek's, this still doesn't change the fact that ancient Greeks such as Isocrates continued to consider the general Macedonian population to be non-Greek. For reasons of politics and prestige, it was common for the rulers of various nations in the ancient world to claim descent from other peoples. For instance, if we were to accept the highly improbably Argead claim to be 'Greeks' originally from the Peloponnese, then we must also accept the following impropable claims as well;
The Spartans kings as 'genuine Egyptians'
"...the Dorian Chieftans are pure are genuine Egyptians. This is the accepted Greek version of the Spartan royal house."
Herodotus., The Histories, 6.54.
The Persians kings as 'Greeks'
"We Persians believe we are descended from Perses, whose father was Danae's son Perseus, and whose mother was Andromeda the daughter of Cepheus. Thus we are of the same blood as yourselves, and it would not be right for us to make war upon the people from whom we have sprung."
Herodotus., The Histories, 7.150.
...And the Lycestian Macedonian kings (rivals of the Argeads for the throne of Macedonia), at one stage claimed to be 'Bacciads' (Corinthian Greeks) ruling over a non-Greek people...the Macedonians.
"These people, I say, were not ruled by men of native stock; and the Lyncestae became subject to Arrabaeus, who was of the stock of the Bacchiads."
Strabo., Geography, VII.8.
As you can see, the Argead claim of descent from Argos as well as these other claims have more to do with politics and prestige then reality.
This inscription was found in Pella and is called "Pella Katadesmos". It was written by a woman in Pella and it is a love spell. The language is Doric Greek. The alphabet is Greek. The tablet is dated between the 4th and 3rd century BC.
As I wrote before, why is it that evidence of just about every other dialect of ancient Greek has been found on artifacts in Macedonia but not one single trace has ever been found of this elusive 'Greek' Macedonian dialect. Remember, if it was a 'Greek' dialect, then it was so different that both Greeks and Macedonians needed translators for basic communication as evidenced on numerous occasions by the ancient historians. Therefore if this were the case then it would be easy to discover evidence of the elusive dialect, but no trace has ever been found. This fact together with the existence of various Greek dialects being used in Macedonia proves that Greek was a foreign language in the region which was brought into Macedonia as a result of the influence of the various Greek colonies established in Chalcidice as well as Macedonia's proximity to Greece.
Again, I repeat; to this day not one inscription in the lands inhabited by the ancient Macedonians has been found in any other language than Greek. There has been no archaeological evidence to suggest that the ancient Macedonians spoke an entirely different language than the other Hellenic peoples. Every coin, tomb, inscription, artifact, statue etc is in Greek.
The ancient Macedonian elite initially adopted various ancient Greek dialects for reasons of prestige and diplomacy though contact with the ancient Greek colonies in Macedonia such as Olynthos etc. It was only later that Alexander III (the great) adopted the koine as the official administrative language of his multinational, multiracial empire. The ancient Macedonian aristocrat Philotas cleary confirms this fact in a statement during his trial;
"One charge made against me is that I disdain to communicate in my native language, that I have no respect for Macedonian customs (which means I have designs on an empire I dispise). That native language of ours has long been rendered obsolete though our dealings with other nations, and conquerors and conquered alike most learn a foreign tongue."
Quintus Curtius Rufus., The History Of Alexander, Book Six, 23.
Although the ancient Macedonians never wrote in there own langauge, evidence of their language has come down to us today through their typonyms such as;
Bylazora
Doberus
Edessa
Pluinna
Ossa
Stargira
Here are ancient Macedonian coins from both ancient Macedonia
Armenia - Tigranes II (37-74bc)
Cilicia (31bc)
Judea - Trajan of Sepphoris (82ad)
Moesia (198ad)
Paeonia - Audoleon (315bc)
Phoenicia - Tyre (71ad)
Phrygia - Akmoneia (33bc)
Thrace - Kotys II (57bc)
Scythia - Vonones (75bc)
Etc Etc Etc
Comment