Originally posted by Voltron
View Post
Interview with Nikola Karev 1903 I am Macedonian
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThere is a wrong translation on the second page of the english version. 4th bottom paragraph from the right top. It says:
"Whatever kind of watering, it refreshes us and has forced us to turn our branches to that side which, we admit we have nothing in common, and to run from you with which we do not share the same blood and history. This is in some way a protest against Greek interest in us."
The word "not" is wrong. Its not included in the original text. Also the last sentence should say "This is in some way a protest against Greek indifference to us". Not "interest" in us.
The correct translation is below:
"Whatever watering it may be, it refreshes us and made us turn our branches towards that place which I confess nothing unites us (Bulgarians) and to leave you whom we have one blood and one history. This is some way a protest of against Greek indifference to us."
Now reading this interview I cant help but notice that Karev was looking for Greek support. His argument is that he was forced to side with the Bulgarians since Greek support was nonexistant.
Voltron, did he say that he was a Macedonian?
Isn't it funny that the only instances you found are those two?Macedonian Truth Organisation
Comment
-
-
No, but when he said that " our branches go towards the side that refreshes us even though nothing unites us " he obviously meant the Bulgarians. At least thats how I read it.
Also, I wasnt looking to point holes in the text, im just telling you the correct translation. The correct translation completely changes the meaning of how its written in English. According to the original text, Karev feels that he shares a common heritage with the Greeks. "Same blood, same history". I didnt say that, he did.
Now if what he said was posturing for support is a different debate which we'll never know the truth. But if he really believed that then I think its really significant in how perceptions change over time.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Soldier of Macedon View PostIf you read it a little more carefully you will also notice that he says even if a Turk offers his hand to save us, we will grab it with gratitude. The whole point was Macedonian independence - Greeks, Bulgars, Turks, etc were only a means to an end.
Albeit he was willing to accept support from wherever it came from but I think he was ultimatly bothered by the Greek indifference to the cause. He mentions it too at the last part where he says " This is some way a protest against Greek indifference to us ".
Comment
-
-
So Voltron does this change the fact that he is a Macedonian? And this is noted in a Greek source even. Do you remember when your compatriots claimed this document to be a fake, I am talking about the English version. Don't they look stupid now? When we have the original to support it.Macedonian Truth Organisation
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Daskalot View PostSo Voltron does this change the fact that he is a Macedonian? And this is noted in a Greek source even. Do you remember when your compatriots claimed this document to be a fake, I am talking about the English version. Don't they look stupid now? When we have the original to support it.
Yes, he self declared himself as a Macedonian.
What is intersting is that when Karev said he was Macedonian, the response he received was then he is subsequently Greek. This was in 1903 not recent. Then towards the end Karev basically said we share the same blood and history. In other words "Una Faccia Una Razza " I dont know much about Karev, but my first impression is that he is a respectable individual.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Voltron View Postthe response he received was then he is subsequently Greek.
Can we please stick to what we know...
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThen towards the end Karev basically said we share the same blood and history. In other words "Una Faccia Una Razza "
What he does not know he does not speculate about it.
But even if we take your version of the story is true, obviously the Interviewer was damping him and labels him as Bugarophron and did not consider him a kin, which really leaves you alone in the whole allusion here.
So we are left with one conclusion: Karev thought about him self to be a Macedonian, one like Alexandar. The rest was irrelevant to him.Last edited by makedonin; 06-29-2011, 10:31 AM.To enquire after the impression behind an idea is the way to remove disputes concerning nature and reality.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by makedonin View PostAnd his response was that he does not know, thus he sticks to what he knows, that is that he is a Macedonian.
Can we please stick to what we know...
You are somehow standing alone there. As far as the text reveals, Karev actually holds to his conviction that he is a Macedonian, he does not really cares much about others, and he is prepared to do anything to achieve Macedonian goals.
What he does not know he does not speculate about it.
But even if we take your version of the story is true, obviously the Interviewer was damping him and labels him as Bugarophron and did not consider him a kin, which really leaves you alone in the whole allusion here.
So we are left with one conclusion: Karev thought about him self to be a Macedonian, one like Alexandar. The rest was irrelevant to him.
Regarding Alexander and Macedonians he gives a reply to this. He says clearly that they were Greek. This confuses the interviewer because again Karev is asked, "then why you being Greek want to side with Bulgaria" ? Then he goes on to give his reasoning of the lack of support from Greece. His ultimate aim was to have a republic like Switzerland with "3 tribes" living in peace. Im not sure if he was referring to the tribes of Switzerland or Macedonia. What is clear though is that his intention was a Multi-Ethnic Republic.
Karev simply does not identify himself with anything else around him, being Greek, Turk or Bulgarian. He sees himself as Macedonian while respecting and not trying to negate the Greek history. Then to close the interview he says again "we share the same blood and history" which leaves the only difference between us to be linguistic in nature. That is an extremely balanced approach to this and too bad we dont have him around nowadays.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Voltron View PostMakedonin,
Regarding Alexander and Macedonians he gives a reply to this. He says clearly that they were Greek.
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThis confuses the interviewer because again Karev is asked, "then why you being Greek want to side with Bulgaria" ?
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThen he goes on to give his reasoning of the lack of support from Greece.
And the support was expected because Macedonians were actively involved in liberation of Greece as Christian brothers, which was their only mistake and illusion, not some blood line.
Christianity did not prevent the Greeks to deliver Macedonian revolutionaries to the Turks on a plate, nor did their alleged blood kinship with Macedonians.
Originally posted by Voltron View PostHis ultimate aim was to have a republic like Switzerland with "3 tribes" living in peace. Im not sure if he was referring to the tribes of Switzerland or Macedonia. What is clear though is that his intention was a Multi-Ethnic Republic.
It is what should give all other minorities the reason to be loyal to the Revolutionary movement for liberation of Macedonia.
You can't expect something with out giving something in return.
The idea is nothing new too. You have to look into the Kreshna/ Raslovci uprising where the idea was sounded already.
Originally posted by Voltron View PostKarev simply does not identify himself with anything else around him, being Greek, Turk or Bulgarian.
However I wonder why you left out the Serbs and Albanians!?
Originally posted by Voltron View PostHe sees himself as Macedonian while respecting and not trying to negate the Greek history.
The last thing he needs is to endeavor historical claims and debates.
He is just not interested with it, and reiterates what he already heard or learned somewhere else.
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThen to close the interview he says again "we share the same blood and history" which leaves the only difference between us to be linguistic in nature.
Are you reinterpreting something here?
Originally posted by Voltron View PostThat is an extremely balanced approach to this and too bad we dont have him around nowadays.Last edited by makedonin; 06-30-2011, 05:16 AM.To enquire after the impression behind an idea is the way to remove disputes concerning nature and reality.
Comment
-
-
Voltron, your interpretation of his meaning and your subsequent conclusions are your own and yours alone. Others may interpret Karev's responses as meaning something quite different to your own interpretations.
For example, Karev says he is Macedonian. Then he says he is a descendant of Alexander the Great. This is a clear statement saying that he, as a Macedonian, like other Macedonians, are descended from the ancient Macedonians.
When the interviewer asks him if that means he is Greek, he responds with a clear 'no'. A clear statement here that follows on from the previous, where he disagrees with this notion that the ancient Macedonians were Greek, or at the very least that the Macedonians, related to the ancient Macedonians (according to Karev's previous statement), are not Greek.
When the interviewer pushes the notion that Alexander the Great was Greek, Karev's response can be interpreted as simply suggesting that the notion the interviewer is presenting is simply the one that is taught, not necessarily saying that it is truth.
Not unlike the present day.Last edited by Rogi; 06-30-2011, 08:11 AM.
Comment
-
-
Of course others may have different interpretations. Mine are based off what he has said, whereas the english translation is wrong. So at least lets interpret the correct version.
Regarding the Macedonians of antiquity, it is often said that in those years Greeks did not identify with them. You have a thread dedicated to that, yet in 1903 it was obvious to Greeks that Macedonians meant Greek. Then there is the asseration that there were no Greeks in Macedonia in the last century, yet again Karev dispels that.
So although he says that he is Macedonian not Greek he then says we share the same blood and history. Its right there on the second page towards the end. On the english version its stated wrongly that he said we do not share the same blood and history.
Why would he say that ? To me it can either be of two things. He wanted Greek support for his cause, or by saying he is Macedonian he is recognising the Greek Historical aspect of the term Macedonian. Is that such bad thing ? Afterall, isnt it you yourselves that say that the Slavic aspect is only linguistic in nature ? It seems to me that Karev has it all figured out.
Comment
-
-
[QUOTE]Originally posted by makedonin View Post
However I wonder why you left out the Serbs and Albanians!?
Well excuse me, but I don't see that in the story. How comes that you can see that?
Also, I never said there was something wrong with a Multi-ethnic Republic. I didnt mean it that way. As far as what he was taught, well what can I say. If we start to doubt everything I might as well doubt the existance of outer space for example.
Comment
-
-
Firstly, where in his answers do you see any indication to support this claim that '1903 it was obvious to Greeks that Macedonians meant Greek'?
Originally posted by Voltron View Postby saying he is Macedonian he is recognising the Greek Historical aspect of the term Macedonian
Comment
-
-
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Rogi View PostFirstly, where in his answers do you see any indication to support this claim that '1903 it was obvious to Greeks that Macedonians meant Greek'?
That's quite a stretch, perhaps you can elaborate further on how you came to this far-fetched conclusion?
Its my opinion, dont shoot me for it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RogiFirstly, where in his answers do you see any indication to support this claim that '1903 it was obvious to Greeks that Macedonians meant Greek'?Originally posted by Voltron View PostI was referring to the interviewer.
Liar, No you weren't, you only have to go to the recent post of yours to see who you were referring to.
Why would he say that ? To me it can either be of two things. He wanted Greek support for his cause, or by saying he is Macedonian he is recognising the Greek Historical aspect of the term Macedonian. Is that such bad thing ? Afterall, isnt it you yourselves that say that the Slavic aspect is only linguistic in nature ? It seems to me that Karev has it all figured out.Last edited by Bill77; 06-30-2011, 04:40 PM.http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum/showthread.php?p=120873#post120873
Comment
-
Comment