I understand here too risto, however, by historical views i mean the roles of vancho, vlado, and imro, not the political. do we both not agree the treaty of bucharest was the beginning of the end? Or that ther only good thing tito ever did for us was give our name back, albeit in puppet form? If I am mistaken maybe i should leave for awhile, however, i dont believe tatko ever left the discusiion, and aside from you attacking his character, i can carry on with you opposing his other beliefs, you know what i mean
?
?
Comment