I am writing this because I was prompted to by EM.
I was not going to pursue this issue because I think anyone with a brain can understand the logic/validity in my arguments, and likewise, the lack of adequate reply to them as tacit confirmation to the assertion most Egej Macedonians 'just don't want to' - maybe as EM suggest, because of 'emotional attachment', which to me is the most pathetic excuse ever as many of that earlier generation paid with their lives fighting for their freedom only to 'see' their decedents cling to, like their mother's breast, the very thing they fought and died against. If that's not the ultimate 'spit in your face', then what is?
The actions (or should that be, inaction) of the Egej Macedonians also seriously puts back the very recognition they claim to want. As suggested by someone a 'mass change of name would make the loudest "We Exist!" statement world wide that they can at this time. Such an action, I think, would also strengthen RoM's hand in any negotiations (not that I think they should be negotiating in the first place, just saying seeing this is the current situation). It may even force other countries to put pressure on Greece to recognise the Macedonians in Greece as a minority group. Instead, they look like a joke - you want to sit back and 'someone else' fix everything.
Some people have offered reasons why some people would find it difficult to change their names. Noted, but it doesn't address the question,
"What is the excuses for the 'most people' not changing their name?"
Given that there would be some people who have used their surname as part of their business's name and would therefor be in a more difficult position to change their name, I showed reason why this excuse would not exist for most people. It then follows there must be different reason(s) why the 'most people' have not changed their name.
EM suggested 'emotional attachment' as a factor. RtG (or anyone), being of the Egej community, and working in a field that gives you contact with a large number of people, do you have any (and you may not, that's Ok.) further insights as to why the 'most people' have not changed their names?
The only 3 reasons that I can think of are -
1. Extraordinary Egej Macedonians
An extraordinary amount of Egej Macedonians are involved in businesses compared to the amount in society. The chance of this being true would be small, but not something that can be ruled out, ie they just could be very 'businessy' people.
Even if this were true, it is not enough to complete the equation. Many people can have businesses but, unless their name forms part of the business's name, ie in the form 'Fred Cojekos Pty Ltd' or close similarity, they would have no problem AT ALL in changing their name.
If the above were true, then it would follow, that a hugely disproportionate amount of Egej Macedonians have businesses AND a huge disproportionate amount of this group are either egotistical, or unimaginative, that the best name for their business that they could come up with was their surname.
This is not to say that some people would not naturally be like this, in any society, but to have a hugely disproportionate amount doing BOTH things (ie in business and using their surname) is statistically weired, to say the least, or false.
What are your thoughts on the likelihood of such a situation. How much weight can be put on this excuse? ie how many people are in this predicament - a few or near 90%?
2. Harm to relatives in Greece
This is a reason I have heard many times. I don't know how true it is, but not wanting to argue with people, I've never pushed the subject. It seemed plausible, but strange, to think that the Greeks would hold a relative responsible for the actions of someone else. Has anyone had this happen to a relative? Could this happen in today's day and age? People have said they had grand-parents or a great-uncle. ect left in Greece. With the passage of time those older relatives have passed on, yet still this reason is often given. Many people are now 4th or more generation in the diaspora, and that means any remaining relative in 'danger' would be starting to be more distant. How can a not close relative be responsible? It's starting to sound a bit dubious as an excuse.
3. Not being able to go back to Greece for holiday/visiting relatives
Has this happened to anyone just for changing their name or going to a Macedonian church, or is this an 'urban legend'? In the 70's or 80's maybe, but would/could this happen today? I hardly ever go to church, but my parents say that over time they have encountered more and more Macedonians from Egej at church instead of going to Greek Churches. It seems to be not such a concern these days. Is this a correct view?
If some people 'don't fit the mould' and can't change their name easily, then what is the real reason the 'most people' have not change their names? They can't all use the one same excuse.
I was not going to pursue this issue because I think anyone with a brain can understand the logic/validity in my arguments, and likewise, the lack of adequate reply to them as tacit confirmation to the assertion most Egej Macedonians 'just don't want to' - maybe as EM suggest, because of 'emotional attachment', which to me is the most pathetic excuse ever as many of that earlier generation paid with their lives fighting for their freedom only to 'see' their decedents cling to, like their mother's breast, the very thing they fought and died against. If that's not the ultimate 'spit in your face', then what is?
The actions (or should that be, inaction) of the Egej Macedonians also seriously puts back the very recognition they claim to want. As suggested by someone a 'mass change of name would make the loudest "We Exist!" statement world wide that they can at this time. Such an action, I think, would also strengthen RoM's hand in any negotiations (not that I think they should be negotiating in the first place, just saying seeing this is the current situation). It may even force other countries to put pressure on Greece to recognise the Macedonians in Greece as a minority group. Instead, they look like a joke - you want to sit back and 'someone else' fix everything.
Some people have offered reasons why some people would find it difficult to change their names. Noted, but it doesn't address the question,
"What is the excuses for the 'most people' not changing their name?"
Given that there would be some people who have used their surname as part of their business's name and would therefor be in a more difficult position to change their name, I showed reason why this excuse would not exist for most people. It then follows there must be different reason(s) why the 'most people' have not changed their name.
EM suggested 'emotional attachment' as a factor. RtG (or anyone), being of the Egej community, and working in a field that gives you contact with a large number of people, do you have any (and you may not, that's Ok.) further insights as to why the 'most people' have not changed their names?
The only 3 reasons that I can think of are -
1. Extraordinary Egej Macedonians
An extraordinary amount of Egej Macedonians are involved in businesses compared to the amount in society. The chance of this being true would be small, but not something that can be ruled out, ie they just could be very 'businessy' people.
Even if this were true, it is not enough to complete the equation. Many people can have businesses but, unless their name forms part of the business's name, ie in the form 'Fred Cojekos Pty Ltd' or close similarity, they would have no problem AT ALL in changing their name.
If the above were true, then it would follow, that a hugely disproportionate amount of Egej Macedonians have businesses AND a huge disproportionate amount of this group are either egotistical, or unimaginative, that the best name for their business that they could come up with was their surname.
This is not to say that some people would not naturally be like this, in any society, but to have a hugely disproportionate amount doing BOTH things (ie in business and using their surname) is statistically weired, to say the least, or false.
What are your thoughts on the likelihood of such a situation. How much weight can be put on this excuse? ie how many people are in this predicament - a few or near 90%?
2. Harm to relatives in Greece
This is a reason I have heard many times. I don't know how true it is, but not wanting to argue with people, I've never pushed the subject. It seemed plausible, but strange, to think that the Greeks would hold a relative responsible for the actions of someone else. Has anyone had this happen to a relative? Could this happen in today's day and age? People have said they had grand-parents or a great-uncle. ect left in Greece. With the passage of time those older relatives have passed on, yet still this reason is often given. Many people are now 4th or more generation in the diaspora, and that means any remaining relative in 'danger' would be starting to be more distant. How can a not close relative be responsible? It's starting to sound a bit dubious as an excuse.
3. Not being able to go back to Greece for holiday/visiting relatives
Has this happened to anyone just for changing their name or going to a Macedonian church, or is this an 'urban legend'? In the 70's or 80's maybe, but would/could this happen today? I hardly ever go to church, but my parents say that over time they have encountered more and more Macedonians from Egej at church instead of going to Greek Churches. It seems to be not such a concern these days. Is this a correct view?
If some people 'don't fit the mould' and can't change their name easily, then what is the real reason the 'most people' have not change their names? They can't all use the one same excuse.
Comment