Originally posted by EgejskaMakedonia
View Post
Just one example to illustrate the above point, during prohibition in the 1920's there was more alcohol sold and more drunkenness than pre the law, only now the price was much higher and it has been said by many that the government supported illegal operation to get a cut of the illicit trade. It was ONLY after prohibition ended that certain drugs were made illegal and the 'war on drugs' began - one lucrative trade following another.
By making drug illegal the price goes up and competition can be controlled. It is known that the USA (and others) have been involved in the drug trade - The 'opium wars' in China, flying in drugs from Vietnam during the war, allowing and protecting the poppy fields in Afghanistan, supporting certain drug lords (USA operatives) over their rival drug lords (re 'Fast and Furious' gun running operation/investigation and the wrongful death suit by the family of a border patrol guard killed by Mexican drug runners using USA government supplied guns (the serial number on the gun used matched those involved in 'Fast and Furious')) and Wells Fargo (a major USA bank and one of the 6 elite ie NWO banks) copping a slap-on-the-wrist token fine when caught laundering 500 Billion (yes with a B) dollars in drug money in one year and also being investigated/suspected the drug cartel whose money it was is the same one involve in 'Fast and Furious'. So you can see there are links to events like a string of sausages - more than 2 parties involved is the definition of a conspiracy. This was to show that conspiracies exist and that the government is involved.
The UN was set up by the major Western powers. From the onset one of the main ideas behind the UN was to have a forum for nations to discuss things and collectively pressure those governments no abiding by acceptable standards thereby avoiding future major conflicts. The other prevailing idea of preventing future major conflicts was multiculturalism by mixing people around the globe so there wont/can't be the pressures of a 'us' Vs 'them' mentality if the 'us' is the same mixed lot as the 'them'. That is the roots of multiculturalism.
Although the idea of multiculturalism sort of sounds fine in theory the funny thing is how it is applied in practice - it is Western (and hence Christian) societies that are being flooded by 'all sorts' to the point that recent studies predict Western societies will become minorities in their own countries from 2015 - 2020 depending on the country and some by 2025, which if you think it's not that far off. Multiculturalism is one of the key tools used to ultimately bring about the decline and possible destruction of Western/European societies. Further, those pressures to implement multiculturalism are not applied to non-Western countries ie wouldn't some poor Indians or Chinese want to immigrate to richer Arab nations? In fact many non-Western nations have very discriminatory laws and the UN is not forcing them to change anything so it becomes clear that the premise that multiculturalism is sold by is a lie against Western societies.
The NWO is not a myth - presidents, past and present, from many nations and including the Pope have been talking about and calling for one world government and financial system ie a NWO.
Sorry about the length but in order to answer the question, and in the process hopefully bring everyone to the 'same page', it was necessary to establish that
1. conspiracies do exist and that the government is involved in conspiracies.
2. the same government involved in conspiracies were involved in setting up the UN and the policy of multiculturalism.
3. multiculturalism was forced on Western societies - does anyone remember an election or referendum on implementing multiculturalism in their Western/European society in ANY country - NO!!! So if the people are the sovereign in a democracy and own the government who was it that gave the government the right to implement a law into our society that irrevocably alters the very fabric of our societies forever? - NOONE! This is a huge event and not one vote was had in ANY country. It was a law made by our own governments whereby both ruling and opposition parties held the same policy making it IMPOSSIBLE to vote for anyone if you did NOT want multiculturalism. This then means it was an IMPOSED law by the UN, but the UN is a creation of our Western governments - do you see the loop? In order to be implemented by every Western government means a coordinated event by more than 2 parties ie the very definition of a conspiracy!!!
4. multiculturalism is ONLY applied to Western societies ie it itself is discriminatory even though it is sold as an anti-discrimination policy.
5. multiculturalism ie now a proven conspiracy and other (low birth rate - I'll answer elsewhere) factors are used in a 'slow kill operation' to destroy Western societies because it is ONLY the Western societies with the ability, means and will to stop their totalitarian plans. They remove the ability by dumbing down everyone chemically, they remove the means by impoverishing people (re current economic problem which will not stop - Greece is F'ed and Italy, Spain, Portugal, are headed for the rocks closely followed by the USA) and diluting Western society's numbers via multiculturalism, and they remove the will by a combination of the above factors and others that 'it's all too hopeless and there's nothing you can do to change it'.
The simple answer to "Why does everything have to be a NWO conspiracy?" is because in order for their plan to work all the factors affecting society need to be controlled (the "everything" bit) and because it's done by more than 2 parties (the definition of a conspiracy ie the "conspiracy" bit of the question) it is a conspiracy and because it's done by an elite of government/business/banking groups, the same ones calling for a NWO, it is the "NWO" bit of the question - so "everything" is a "conspiracy" by the "NWO" is your answer.
Since their actions are against Western societies and most people in Western societies are Christian there actions are also anti-Christian.
Copied for later reference.
Comment