A Lost European Culture, Pulled From Obscurity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bratot
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 2855

    A Lost European Culture, Pulled From Obscurity

    Before the glory that was Greece and Rome, even before the first cities of Mesopotamia or temples along the Nile, there lived in the Lower Danube Valley and the Balkan foothills people who were ahead of their time in art, technology and long-distance trade.


    For 1,500 years, starting earlier than 5000 B.C., they farmed and built sizable towns, a few with as many as 2,000 dwellings. They mastered large-scale copper smelting, the new technology of the age. Their graves held an impressive array of exquisite headdresses and necklaces and, in one cemetery, the earliest major assemblage of gold artifacts to be found anywhere in the world.
    The striking designs of their pottery speak of the refinement of the culture’s visual language. Until recent discoveries, the most intriguing artifacts were the ubiquitous terracotta “goddess” figurines, originally interpreted as evidence of the spiritual and political power of women in society.
    New research, archaeologists and historians say, has broadened understanding of this long overlooked culture, which seemed to have approached the threshold of “civilization” status.
    Writing had yet to be invented, and so no one knows what the people called themselves.
    To some scholars, the people and the region are simply Old Europe.


    The little-known culture is being rescued from obscurity in an exhibition, “The Lost World of Old Europe: the Danube Valley, 5000-3500 B.C.,” which opened last month at the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World at New York University. More than 250 artifacts from museums in Bulgaria, Moldova and Romania are on display for the first time in the United States. The show will run through April 25.
    At its peak, around 4500 B.C., said David W. Anthony, the exhibition’s guest curator, “Old Europe was among the most sophisticated and technologically advanced places in the world” and was developing “many of the political, technological and ideological signs of civilization.”


    At the exhibition preview, Roger S. Bagnall, director of the institute, confessed that until now “a great many archaeologists had not heard of these Old Europe cultures.”
    Admiring the colorful ceramics, Dr. Bagnall, a specialist in Egyptian archaeology, remarked that at the time “Egyptians were certainly not making pottery like this.”
    A show catalog, published by Princeton University Press, is the first compendium in English of research on Old Europe discoveries. The book, edited by Dr. Anthony, with Jennifer Y. Chi, the institute’s associate director for exhibitions, includes essays by experts from Britain, France, Germany, the United States and the countries where the culture existed.

    Although excavations over the last century uncovered traces of ancient settlements and the goddess figurines, it was not until local archaeologists in 1972 discovered a large fifth-millennium B.C. cemetery at Varna, Bulgaria, that they began to suspect these were not poor people living in unstructured egalitarian societies. Even then, confined in cold war isolation behind the Iron Curtain, Bulgarians and Romanians were unable to spread their knowledge to the West.

    The story now emerging is of pioneer farmers after about 6200 B.C. moving north into Old Europe from Greece and Macedonia, bringing wheat and barley seeds and domesticated cattle and sheep.

    They established colonies along the Black Sea and in the river plains and hills, and these evolved into related but somewhat distinct cultures, archaeologists have learned. The settlements maintained close contact through networks of trade in copper and gold and also shared patterns of ceramics.

    The Spondylus shell from the Aegean Sea was a special item of trade. Perhaps the shells, used in pendants and bracelets, were symbols of their Aegean ancestors. Other scholars view such long-distance acquisitions as being motivated in part by ideology in which goods are not commodities in the modern sense but rather “valuables,” symbols of status and recognition.

    Last edited by Bratot; 06-26-2010, 05:37 PM.
    The purpose of the media is not to make you to think that the name must be changed, but to get you into debate - what name would suit us! - Bratot
  • Bratot
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 2855

    #2
    The purpose of the media is not to make you to think that the name must be changed, but to get you into debate - what name would suit us! - Bratot

    Comment

    • fyrOM
      Banned
      • Feb 2010
      • 2180

      #3
      Perhaps the word Sweden or sve den can point to the roots of the people who moved into Europe to become distinct cultures.

      Comment

      • julie
        Senior Member
        • May 2009
        • 3869

        #4
        Cheers Bratot, truly fascinating
        "The moral revolution - the revolution of the mind, heart and soul of an enslaved people, is our greatest task."__________________Gotse Delchev

        Comment

        • Daskalot
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 4345

          #5
          Originally posted by OziMak View Post
          Perhaps the word Sweden or sve den can point to the roots of the people who moved into Europe to become distinct cultures.
          The name of Sweden is not the Swedish name of the country but the English equivalent. The name in Swedish is "Sverige" and it is a combined word of the two words "Svea" and "Rike", the "Svea" was a tribe in the Viking era and "Rike" means country.
          Macedonian Truth Organisation

          Comment

          • indigen
            Senior Member
            • May 2009
            • 1558

            #6


            Renfrew, Colin. "Ancient Europe is Older Than We Thought." National Geographic (November 1977), 614-23.

            There is some good material in the above issue of NG. Daskale, maybe you can obtain a few scans if you concur with me on the usefulness of some of the material found in the above issue of NG?

            MEGALITHIC CULTURES
            Is Ancient Europe Older?



            Colin Renfrew, Professor of Archaeology
            at the University of Southampton,
            wrote an article
            "Ancient Europe Is Older Than We Thought", in
            National Geographic Magazine,
            Nov. 1977, Vol. 152, No. 5, pp. 615 et seq.

            Renfrew presents a succinct summary of the change of direction
            which our study of ancient history should be taking.
            In spite of the fact that he wrote in 1977,
            most historical scholars have continued on their old errant path.

            Renfrew shows that the accepted chronology and framework
            for ancient European history "has collapsed"
            because of the results obtained by modern dendrochronology
            (i.e. dating by tree rings) and radiocarbon dating.

            European megaliths have been proven by modern methods
            to be OLDER than the Pyramids of Egypt or Mesopotamian temples.

            Renfrew points to dendrochronological work on bristlecone pine
            done by Dr. C.W. Ferguson of the University of Arizona
            and Hans E. Suess of the University of California at San Diego
            who calibrated tree-ring charts to calendar dates,
            setting back the dating of European megaliths by a 1000 years.

            Similarly, Renfrew writes that copper tools in Europe
            which had originally been dated by scholars to ca. 2300 BC
            actually date back to ca. 3500 BC and as early as 4500 B.C.

            Hence, our view of ancient history must be completely amended.
            Of course, the scholars are reluctant to take the necessary steps.
            It means admitting their whole chronology to be a house of cards.

            Comment

            • Bratot
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 2855

              #7
              „Голема силина и голем потенцијал во капиталот на карпестата уметност на Македонија, која ја присвојуваат Грците“

              Што велат оние кои што талкаат ентузијастички со години по беспаќата на Македонија и ги истражуваат гравирите на карпите? За најекспонираниот во оваа сфера, доктор Душко Алексовски од Кратово, професор на државниот универзитет во Штип и раководител на Македонскиот центар за карпеста уметност, не постојат никакви дилеми: според него, „карпестата уметност на Македонија е значајно културно - историско наследство воопшто на човечката цивилизација“.

              Алексовски дополнува:

              „За време на меѓународни конгреси, за време на меѓународни симпозиуми и конференции ние учествуваме секоја година и тоа е меѓународна верификација за она што ние го зборуваме денес за карпестата уметност во нашата земја. Сето тоа во врска со неа е објавено во меѓународни списанија, редактирани од членови на странски академии.“

              Д-р Алексовски укажува и на еден момент особено интересен од сегашен аспект:

              „За мене круна на нашите истражувања за карпестата уметност во Македонија, кои беа финансирани во одреден период и од УНЕСКО, е тоа што нашите колеги од оваа област во Грција одлучија мене да ме прогласат за – Грк ! Во сите списанија до се‘ она што се објавуваше за оваа проблематика, без моја дозвола, стоеше ‘Грк’, ‘Грција’. Штом некој се бори да ве присвои, тогаш тоа значи дека има голема силина во она што го работите, оти постои голем потенцијал во тој капитал на карпестата уметност во Македонија.“

              The purpose of the media is not to make you to think that the name must be changed, but to get you into debate - what name would suit us! - Bratot

              Comment

              • Pelister
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 2742

                #8
                Isn't it a paradox that Europe was 'civilized' by the barbarians.

                Comment

                Working...
                X