What about Cyril and Methodius?
The Illyrians
Collapse
X
-
3 days later and still no response? Time for you to disappear again into your Greek dreamland, where everything is Greek....including Mike Tyson!On Delchev's sarcophagus you can read the following inscription: "We swear the future generations to bury these sacred bones in the capital of Independent Macedonia. August 1923 Illinden"
Comment
-
-
I'm sorry I just noticed that. I had been reading relevant material elsewhere (ranging from other threads to Risto Stefov) but I still haven't understood your national position, or at least some variations of it. I would like a relatively simple version (max 10-20 lines) on how Cyril and Methodius fit in your narrative(s), either the ones that accept or the ones that reject the Slavic migration.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Amphipolis View PostI'm sorry I just noticed that. I had been reading relevant material elsewhere (ranging from other threads to Risto Stefov) but I still haven't understood your national position, or at least some variations of it. I would like a relatively simple version (max 10-20 lines) on how Cyril and Methodius fit in your narrative(s), either the ones that accept or the ones that reject the Slavic migration.
An answer was required, not the following bullshit guised as a question:-
I can't understand exactly what has been discredited, by whom and when.
If there was no Slavic Migration how does one exactly explain Cyril and Methodius (for instance)?On Delchev's sarcophagus you can read the following inscription: "We swear the future generations to bury these sacred bones in the capital of Independent Macedonia. August 1923 Illinden"
Comment
-
-
From what I gather so far Amphipolis, the thesis of the macedonians in this forum is that the language and the alleged slavic migration is not relevant to their origin, as they adopted a form of slavic language, or probably the slavic language that was used in macedonia is the basis for other types of slavic languages/dialects.
Cyril and Methodious gave the written form and codified slavic languages,yet this is not relevant or it does not explain the origin of the people in the balkan area.
People adopt and develop languages all the time.
Feel free to correct me if I am under a wrong impression about this.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by spitfire View PostFrom what I gather so far Amphipolis, the thesis of the macedonians in this forum is that the language and the alleged slavic migration is not relevant to their origin, as they adopted a form of slavic language, or probably the slavic language that was used in macedonia is the basis for other types of slavic languages/dialects.
Cyril and Methodious gave the written form and codified slavic languages,yet this is not relevant or it does not explain the origin of the people in the balkan area.
People adopt and develop languages all the time.
Feel free to correct me if I am under a wrong impression about this.
We are indigenous to the Balkans. No Macedonian on this forum denies this. The conflict in this thread has been about the language -- whether Slavic was adopted or whether it is indigenous to the Balkans.
Comment
-
Comment