Originally posted by Bill77
View Post
FYI: Macedonia does NOT have a "Constitutional Name"! The RIGHTFUL and HISTORICAL (also BIBLICAL) STATE NAME (DRZHAVNO IME) IS MACEDONIA!!! This name is CERTAINLY OLDER than the 2001 UCK Constitution or any other modern day Constitution, e.g. 1991!
More info on this topic at following links:
A Google search for terms "Constitutional name" only relates to Macedonia?
Originally Posted by Prolet
France and Macedonia signed an official bilateral document under our constitutional name.
France and Macedonia signed an official bilateral document under our constitutional name.
How can it be that Macedonia is the only country that is deemed (by Traitors, their puppets and those parroting in their footsteps out of ignorance.) to have a "Constitutional" name and not a state name like every other state?
Why do you insist on using this anti-Macedonian terminology when most regular MTO users do not or have stopped using it?
Originally posted by Soldier of Macedon
View Post
Let me single out the whole sentence i picked on and tried to make a point.
My beef was with Reeker on one hand wants to respect as he put it a "Sacred Document" which includes our constitutional name. But i know for a fact tomorrow i will read him playing a different tune regarding our name. I am sick of words and pricks from the west contradicting them selves which is why i said (same old Bullshit)
My beef was with Reeker on one hand wants to respect as he put it a "Sacred Document" which includes our constitutional name. But i know for a fact tomorrow i will read him playing a different tune regarding our name. I am sick of words and pricks from the west contradicting them selves which is why i said (same old Bullshit)
Here is what I think it implies (in its latest incarnation):
1. Macedonia will change the state name for INTERNATIONAL USE (which is where state names make sense and are used to IDENTIFY states by others, much like you do not need to call yourself "Bill" to yourself but your name is used to identify you to others!) and the UCK Constitution (the "OUR" and "SACRED DOCUMENT" joke that REEKER is playing on US!) does NOT get amended and thus "our" "Constitutional Name" does not change and will remain for home use.
Another thing, constitution can be changed. So if Reeker is for respecting this sacred document, Will he feel the same if we reinstated the original constitution? would it be a "sacred document" and would his homeland respect it then?
Comment