Originally posted by Vangelovski
View Post
There will be talk about "progress" in the "negotiations" and lots of talk about how "positive and bright our future is" but this will all be assumed to be possible through the 'negotiations' and the negotiation process. In short they will be representing the "negotiations" by putting a positive spin on them. In this sense they are not more than a political tool of the West.
I recall Meto saying that they were putting together a paper to reject the talks (in his Canberra/Queanbeyan) speech. Meto and UMD are full of it.
Comment