Originally posted by amitreski
View Post
your suggestion that this forum is a simple anti UMD bashing venue might almost appear correct now. But you might have forgotten, this place used to be the place that asked simple and legitimate questions of the UMD. The UMD never answered them. Imagine the marketing opportunities if the UMD was more open with its dialogue (assuming honesty and suitability of answers naturally). Within a few short days the MTO gathered well over $5000 for the AMHRC/MHRMI initiative that you have chosen not to support. The UMD is hardly a transparent organisation and surely cannot be still working on its ideology. Be careful with your statements, the UMD is kind of "more internet" less "reality" kind of organisation. It lives by the hype of its online presence. Your organisation keeps posting here for good reason. Many many people read this. Soon you might only have the opportunity to post on Maknews for the 1 participant remaining there.
You were involved with the collaboration with the MPO and that failed miserably. What makes you think your decision making input will ensure success?
I for one am glad you fully support the end of the negotiation process. It took you a very long time to get to that resolution and goes against Meto's recent interview where it is stated the UMD's position has always been against negotiations. We know this is not true and that the UMD will lie and re-create its own history in order to maintain relevance.
Comment