Originally posted by vicsinad
View Post
Originally posted by vicsinad
View Post
Therefor, as one of your Presidents once said "You are with us or you are against us" by you harbouring terrorists makes you involved in sides of this war, you fall in the category of "against us" and should be treated as enemy of the state, therefor you have no rights.
Face it....You are screwed.
Originally posted by vicsinad
View Post
You are confusing your self with a Terrorist and a criminal. I'm not downgrading the seriousness of a criminal (Murderer, rapist, armed robber etc) but terrorism which is most hideous and indiscriminate and again an act of war in the name of radical Islam is different than a criminal act by a individual civilian with personal issues.
Once you understand the difference you would understand why Imediate Safety and security and need to capture and halt this attack was paramount. And once you get your head around the seriousness of Terrorism and what is a terrorist, you will not be concerned about "precedence" and you would understand that Normal due process such as inappropriate time consuming warrents should no longer apply and that this 4th amendment is unreasonable, a hindrance and dangerous. Yes it should be debated wherever this amendment is appropriate and should have changes not to hinder hunts for terrorist, but to expect it to happen while the chase is on was not possible.
Ps: And if you had a terrorist on the loose in your town.......
You would be on the streets cheering the authories as they drive by and exiting your town after the capture of this terrorist just like the citizens in Watertown did and you wouldn't give two hoots about normal due process.
Comment