Yep, Peter Daicos is the culprit, lol.
GUYS OVER IN MACEDONIA
Tim Blair, The Daily Telegraph
June 2, 2017
When Bill Clinton was busted for his skirt-squirting antics with Monica Lewinsky, dutiful wife Hillary presented a fantastic defence. The then-President’s sexual entanglement with a young intern, she said, was the result of a vast right-wing conspiracy: The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president. That was only the beginning. The anti-Clinton conspiracy has since grown ever-wider, now including Russians and – of all people – Macedonians. Is Peter Daicos involved? Yes, probably, because everybody else is. Just take a look at Hillary Queeg's latest wild paranoid theories:
HILLARY CLINTON: How did they know what messages to deliver? Who told them? Who told them? Who were they 'coordinating' with or 'colluding' with? Because the Russians historically in the last couple decades, and then increasingly, are launching cyber attacks, and they are stealing vast amounts of information. A lot of the information they've stolen, they've used for internal purposes to affect markets, to affect the intelligence services, etc. So this was different. They went public. And they were conveying this weaponized information, and the content of it. And they were running, there's all these stories about guys over in Macedonia who are running these fake news sites, and I've seen them now. You sit there and it looks like a low level CNN operation. Like a fake newspaper. So the Russians, in my opinion, and based on the intel and counter-intel people I've talked to, could not have known how best to weaponize that information unless they had been guided.
QUESTION: By Americans?
CLINTON: Guided by Americans and people who had polling and data.
QUESTION: Who is that?
CLINTON: Let me just finish because this is the second and third step. So we know that they did that. We understand it. Best example, so within one hour, one hour of the "Access Hollywood" tapes being leaked, within one hour, the Russians, let's say Wikileaks, same thing, dumped the Jon Podesta e-mails.
Astonishing to think that so many people – me included – once thought Clinton was the stable presidential candidate.
Tim Blair, The Daily Telegraph
June 2, 2017
When Bill Clinton was busted for his skirt-squirting antics with Monica Lewinsky, dutiful wife Hillary presented a fantastic defence. The then-President’s sexual entanglement with a young intern, she said, was the result of a vast right-wing conspiracy: The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president. That was only the beginning. The anti-Clinton conspiracy has since grown ever-wider, now including Russians and – of all people – Macedonians. Is Peter Daicos involved? Yes, probably, because everybody else is. Just take a look at Hillary Queeg's latest wild paranoid theories:
HILLARY CLINTON: How did they know what messages to deliver? Who told them? Who told them? Who were they 'coordinating' with or 'colluding' with? Because the Russians historically in the last couple decades, and then increasingly, are launching cyber attacks, and they are stealing vast amounts of information. A lot of the information they've stolen, they've used for internal purposes to affect markets, to affect the intelligence services, etc. So this was different. They went public. And they were conveying this weaponized information, and the content of it. And they were running, there's all these stories about guys over in Macedonia who are running these fake news sites, and I've seen them now. You sit there and it looks like a low level CNN operation. Like a fake newspaper. So the Russians, in my opinion, and based on the intel and counter-intel people I've talked to, could not have known how best to weaponize that information unless they had been guided.
QUESTION: By Americans?
CLINTON: Guided by Americans and people who had polling and data.
QUESTION: Who is that?
CLINTON: Let me just finish because this is the second and third step. So we know that they did that. We understand it. Best example, so within one hour, one hour of the "Access Hollywood" tapes being leaked, within one hour, the Russians, let's say Wikileaks, same thing, dumped the Jon Podesta e-mails.
Astonishing to think that so many people – me included – once thought Clinton was the stable presidential candidate.
Comment