The European Union - the New Soviet Union?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • I of Macedon
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 222

    The European Union - the New Soviet Union?

    YouTube - The European Union - the New Soviet Union?
    No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun
  • I of Macedon
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 222

    #2
    Former Soviet Dissident Warns For EU Dictatorship
    From the desk of Paul Belien on Mon, 2006-02-27 22:13


    Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.

    Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.

    In his speech Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organization. I attended the meeting and taped the speech. A transcript, as well as the audio fragment (approx. 15 minutes) can be found below. I also had a brief interview with Mr Bukovsky (4 minutes), a transcript and audio fragment of which can also be found below. The interview about the European Union had to be cut short because Mr Bukovsky had other engagements, but it brought back some memories to me, as I had interviewed Vladimir Bukovsky twenty years ago, in 1986, when the Soviet Union, the first monster that he so valiantly fought, was still alive and thriving.

    Mr Bukovsky was one of the heroes of the 20th century. As a young man he exposed the use of psychiatric imprisonment against political prisoners in the former USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1917-1991) and spent a total of twelve years (1964-1976), from his 22nd to his 34th year, in Soviet jails, labour camps and psychiatric institutions. In 1976 the Soviets expelled him to the West. In 1992 he was invited by the Russian government to serve as an expert testifying at the trial conducted to determine whether the Soviet Communist Party had been a criminal institution. To prepare for his testimony Mr Bukovsky was granted access to a large number of documents from Soviet secret archives. He is one of the few people ever to have seen these documents because they are still classified. Using a small handheld scanner and a laptop computer, however, he managed to copy many documents (some with high security clearance), including KGB reports to the Soviet government.

    An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky


    Paul Belien: You were a very famous Soviet dissident and now you are drawing a parallel between the European Union and the Soviet Union. Can you explain this?

    Vladimir Bukovsky:
    I am referrring to structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to create a new historic entity, the Soviet people, all around the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying to create a new people. They call this people “Europeans”, whatever that means.

    According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. In Russia, however, the opposite happened. Instead of withering away the Soviet state became a very powerful state, but the nationalities were obliterated. But when the time of the Soviet collapse came these suppressed feelings of national identity came bouncing back and they nearly destroyed the country. It was so frightening.

    PB: Do you think the same thing can happen when the European Union collapses?

    VB: Absolutely, you can press a spring only that much, and the human psyche is very resilient you know. You can press it, you can press it, but don’t forget it is still accumulating a power to rebound. It is like a spring and it always goes to overshoot.

    PB: But all these countries that joined the European Union did so voluntarily.

    VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.

    PB: What do you think young people should do about the European Union? What should they insist on, to democratize the institution or just abolish it?

    VB: I think that the European Union, like the Soviet Union, cannot be democratized. Gorbachev tried to democratize it and it blew up. This kind of structures cannot be democratized.

    PB: But we have a European Parliament which is chosen by the people.

    VB: The European Parliament is elected on the basis of proportional representation, which is not true representation. And what does it vote on? The percentage of fat in yoghurt, that kind of thing. It is ridiculous. It is given the task of the Supreme Soviet. The average MP can speak for six minutes per year in the Chamber. That is not a real parliament.

    Transcript of Mr Bukovsky’s Brussels speech


    In 1992 I had unprecedented access to Politburo and Central Committee secret documents which have been classified, and still are even now, for 30 years. These documents show very clearly that the whole idea of turning the European common market into a federal state was agreed between the left-wing parties of Europe and Moscow as a joint project which [Soviet leader Mikhail] Gorbachev in 1988-89 called our “common European home.”

    The idea was very simple. It first came up in 1985-86, when the Italian Communists visited Gorbachev, followed by the German Social-Democrats. They all complained that the changes in the world, particularly after [British Prime Minister Margaret] Thatcher introduced privatisation and economic liberalisation, were threatening to wipe out the achievement (as they called it) of generations of Socialists and Social-Democrats – threatening to reverse it completely. Therefore the only way to withstand this onslaught of wild capitalism (as they called it) was to try to introduce the same socialist goals in all countries at once. Prior to that, the left-wing parties and the Soviet Union had opposed European integration very much because they perceived it as a means to block their socialist goals. From 1985 onwards they completely changed their view. The Soviets came to a conclusion and to an agreement with the left-wing parties that if they worked together they could hijack the whole European project and turn it upside down. Instead of an open market they would turn it into a federal state.

    According to the [secret Soviet] documents, 1985-86 is the turning point. I have published most of these documents. You might even find them on the internet. But the conversations they had are really eye opening. For the first time you understand that there is a conspiracy – quite understandable for them, as they were trying to save their political hides. In the East the Soviets needed a change of relations with Europe because they were entering a protracted and very deep structural crisis; in the West the left-wing parties were afraid of being wiped out and losing their influence and prestige. So it was a conspiracy, quite openly made by them, agreed upon, and worked out.

    In January of 1989, for example, a delegation of the Trilateral Commission came to see Gorbachev. It included [former Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro] Nakasone, [former French President Valéry] Giscard d’Estaing, [American banker David] Rockefeller and [former US Secretary of State Henry] Kissinger. They had a very nice conversation where they tried to explain to Gorbachev that Soviet Russia had to integrate into the financial institutions of the world, such as Gatt, the IMF and the World Bank.

    In the middle of it Giscard d’Estaing suddenly takes the floor and says: “Mr President, I cannot tell you exactly when it will happen – probably within 15 years – but Europe is going to be a federal state and you have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work out with us, and the European leaders, how you would react to that, how would you allow the other Easteuropean countries to interact with it or how to become a part of it, you have to be prepared.”

    This was January 1989, at a time when the [1992] Maastricht treaty had not even been drafted. How the hell did Giscard d’Estaing know what was going to happen in 15 years time? And surprise, surprise, how did he become the author of the European constitution [in 2002-03]? A very good question. It does smell of conspiracy, doesn’t it?

    Luckily for us the Soviet part of this conspiracy collapsed earlier and it did not reach the point where Moscow could influence the course of events. But the original idea was to have what they called a convergency, whereby the Soviet Union would mellow somewhat and become more social-democratic, while Western Europe would become social-democratic and socialist. Then there will be convergency. The structures have to fit each other. This is why the structures of the European Union were initially built with the purpose of fitting into the Soviet structure. This is why they are so similar in functioning and in structure.

    It is no accident that the European Parliament, for example, reminds me of the Supreme Soviet. It looks like the Supreme Soviet because it was designed like it. Similary, when you look at the European Commission it looks like the Politburo. I mean it does so exactly, except for the fact that the Commission now has 25 members and the Politburo usually had 13 or 15 members. Apart from that they are exactly the same, unaccountable to anyone, not directly elected by anyone at all. When you look into all this bizarre activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations it looks like Gosplan. We used to have an organisation which was planning everything in the economy, to the last nut and bolt, five years in advance. Exactly the same thing is happening in the EU. When you look at the type of EU corruption, it is exactly the Soviet type of corruption, going from top to bottom rather than going from bottom to top.

    If you go through all the structures and features of this emerging European monster you will notice that it more and more resembles the Soviet Union. Of course, it is a milder version of the Soviet Union. Please, do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that it has a Gulag. It has no KGB – not yet – but I am very carefully watching such structures as Europol for example. That really worries me a lot because this organisation will probably have powers bigger than those of the KGB. They will have diplomatic immunity. Can you imagine a KGB with diplomatic immunity? They will have to police us on 32 kinds of crimes – two of which are particularly worrying, one is called racism, another is called xenophobia. No criminal court on earth defines anything like this as a crime [this is not entirely true, as Belgium already does so – pb]. So it is a new crime, and we have already been warned. Someone from the British government told us that those who object to uncontrolled immigration from the Third World will be regarded as racist and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly.

    Hence, we have now been warned. Meanwhile they are introducing more and more ideology. The Soviet Union used to be a state run by ideology. Today’s ideology of the European Union is social-democratic, statist, and a big part of it is also political correctness. I watch very carefully how political correctness spreads and becomes an oppressive ideology, not to mention the fact that they forbid smoking almost everywhere now. Look at this persecution of people like the Swedish pastor who was persecuted for several months because he said that the Bible does not approve homosexuality. France passed the same law of hate speech concerning gays. Britain is passing hate speech laws concerning race relations and now religious speech, and so on and so forth. What you observe, taken into perspective, is a systematic introduction of ideology which could later be enforced with oppressive measures. Apparently that is the whole purpose of Europol. Otherwise why do we need it? To me Europol looks very suspicious. I watch very carefully who is persecuted for what and what is happening, because that is one field in which I am an expert. I know how Gulags spring up.

    It looks like we are living in a period of rapid, systematic and very consistent dismantlement of democracy. Look at this Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill. It makes ministers into legislators who can introduce new laws without bothering to tell Parliament or anyone. My immediate reaction is why do we need it? Britain survived two world wars, the war with Napoleon, the Spanish Armada, not to mention the Cold War, when we were told at any moment we might have a nuclear world war, without any need for introducing this kind legislation, without the need for suspending our civil liberaties and introducing emergency powers. Why do we need it right now? This can make a dictatorship out of your country in no time.

    Today’s situation is really grim. Major political parties have been completely taken in by the new EU project. None of them really opposes it. They have become very corrupt. Who is going to defend our freedoms? It looks like we are heading towards some kind of collapse, some kind of crisis. The most likely outcome is that there will be an economic collapse in Europe, which in due time is bound to happen with this growth of expenses and taxes. The inability to create a competitive environment, the overregulation of the economy, the bureaucratisation, it is going to lead to economic collapse. Particularly the introduction of the euro was a crazy idea. Currency is not supposed to be political.

    I have no doubt about it. There will be a collapse of the European Union pretty much like the Soviet Union collapsed. But do not forget that when these things collapse they leave such devastation that it takes a generation to recover. Just think what will happen if it comes to an economic crisis. The recrimination between nations will be huge. It might come to blows. Look to the huge number of immigrants from Third World countries now living in Europe. This was promoted by the European Union. What will happen with them if there is an economic collapse? We will probably have, like in the Soviet Union at the end, so much ethnic strife that the mind boggles. In no other country were there such ethnic tensions as in the Soviet Union, except probably in Yugoslavia. So that is exactly what will happen here, too. We have to be prepared for that. This huge edifice of bureaucracy is going to collapse on our heads.

    This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries. But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast. It will be difficult to defeat them. Today it is still simple. If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas. If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no-one will go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers. Anything may happen.

    We are losing time. We have to defeat them. We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect. Otherwise it will be too late. So what should I say? My conclusion is not optimistic. So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough. We are losing and we are wasting time.

    Last edited by I of Macedon; 04-28-2010, 10:41 AM.
    No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun

    Comment

    • makedonin
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 1668

      #3
      Each "Empire" has it beginning and ending no matter how long it lasts. It is the way things go. So the question is, does the Macedonian Government wants to sell the Macedonian Identity for something which is doomed to colaps!?

      Interesting paralels, anyways.
      To enquire after the impression behind an idea is the way to remove disputes concerning nature and reality.

      Comment

      • Daskalot
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 4345

        #4
        So now it becomes very clear why the EU wants a quick settlement in regards to our name, they do not really care what we are named as a country or as a people. To be European is what matters.
        Macedonian Truth Organisation

        Comment

        • Risto the Great
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 15658

          #5
          Excellent article IoM.
          There is no doubt that the EU has no regard for Macedonia. As long as European nations exist in defiance of the EU, there will always be opportunity for other strong nations to undermine the EU. This is the EU's only fear.
          Risto the Great
          MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
          "Holding my breath for the revolution."

          Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com

          Comment

          • Frank
            Banned
            • Mar 2010
            • 687

            #6
            Simply Google EU Empire people I have been against Macedonia wanting membership of a Union that has no reagard for Macedonian dignity every since our Independance.

            Comment

            • The LION will ROAR
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 3231

              #7
              Quote:
              VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.


              I'm surprised Vladimir Bukovsky did not use Macedonia as an example of BLACKMAIL..
              "you want to join EU, well change your name"

              We are seeing signs from all aspects not to join this corrupt EU..So why are we still Negotiating...?
              AND What happens if we change our name and EU collapses...?
              The Macedonians originates it, the Bulgarians imitate it and the Greeks exploit it!

              Comment

              • Dimko-piperkata
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2008
                • 1876

                #8
                once again i must say that macedonia must give up integrating to EU.

                macedonia must orient to russia and turkey !
                1) Macedonians belong to the "older" Mediterranean substratum...
                2) Macedonians are not related with geographically close Greeks, who do not belong to the "older" Mediterranenan substratum...

                Comment

                • The LION will ROAR
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 3231

                  #9
                  EU go to hell..!!

                  The Macedonians originates it, the Bulgarians imitate it and the Greeks exploit it!

                  Comment

                  • Mikail
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 1338

                    #10
                    The EU's totally lost the plot. They should be kicking Greece out, returning Macedonian lands back to the Macedonians and enforcing the repayment of all monies they embezzled to date.
                    From the village of P’pezhani, Tashko Popov, Dimitar Popov-Skenderov and Todor Trpenov were beaten and sentenced to 12 years prison. Pavle Mevchev and Atanas Popov from Vrbeni and Boreshnica joined them in early 1927, they were soon after transferred to Kozhani and executed. As they were leaving Lerin they were heard to shout "With our death, Macedonia will not be lost. Our blood will run, but other Macedonians will rise from it"

                    Comment

                    • I of Macedon
                      Member
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 222

                      #11
                      European Union will go same way as Soviet Union - Godfrey Bloom MEP

                      05/05/2010

                      UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom today poured cold water on the EU's 10-year central economic plan, the so-called 'Lisbon Strategy 2020', comparing the European Union to the Soviet Union.

                      Speaking at the Brussels plenary session, "Europe 2020 - New European Strategy for Jobs and Growth," Godfrey Bloom told Euro-Parliamentarians "not to worry too much about the EU in 2020" because it will not last.

                      "It will go the same way as the Soviet Union which it so resembles - and for the same reasons," Mr Bloom warned. "It is centralised, it's corrupt, it's undemocratic and it's incompetent," he said.

                      "It is driven by an unholy alliance of big business and fat cat bureaucrats. It is sponsored by an eco-fascist agenda from a platform of perverted junk science referred to as climate change," he added.


                      Refering to the various occasions when the people had rejected further EU integration in referendums, Mr Bloom said "the British were not given a chance to have their say thanks to the deceit of the only three parties with access to television debates in my country, aided and abetted by an EU-corrupted public service broadcasting known as the BBC."

                      Mr Bloom concluded: "The EU is already crumbling. The seeds in Greece today will spread through the other Mediterranean countries sooner than we can imagine. And they will eventually reach northern European countries who have been left to pick up the tab. Our children and grandchildren will curse us as they are left to pick up the pieces of the wholly avoidable shambles."

                      No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun

                      Comment

                      • I of Macedon
                        Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 222

                        #12
                        Barroso (President of EU Commission) - European Union is an 'empire'

                        YouTube - Barroso: European Union is 'empire' (short version)
                        No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun

                        Comment

                        • I of Macedon
                          Member
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 222

                          #13
                          An alternative view of the European Union - MEP for south east England Dan Hannan explains whats wrong with the EU

                          YouTube - An alternative view of the European Union
                          No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun

                          Comment

                          • I of Macedon
                            Member
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 222

                            #14
                            EU - The last days of democracy? powerful stuff

                            YouTube - EU - The last days of democracy?
                            No need to sit in the shade, because we stand under our own sun

                            Comment

                            • TrueMacedonian
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 3810

                              #15
                              I of Macedon this is a really good topic you started and loaded with good info. Here's something about the EU re-writing history - http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum...riting+history - and in this re-writing history the EU doesn't have Macedonia's interests in its cards.
                              Slayer Of The Modern "greek" Myth!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X