U.S. Politics, Elections & Culture issues

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vangelovski
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 8531

    #91
    Originally posted by Gocka View Post
    Sounds like a great theory, what page can I find that on?
    You won't find it anywhere because 'no one' said it.
    If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

    The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. John Adams

    Comment

    • Vangelovski
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 8531

      #92
      Originally posted by Gocka View Post
      In your view, how much do you need to earn on a yearly basis, or accumulate in wealth to be considered part of the top 1% 5% 10% 20% AND 30%.

      I commented on this above somewhere. People naively think that even if they become successful that they will be part of the top 1%, not realizing that what they have in mind probably doesn't even put them in the top 30% let alone the top 1%.
      The bracket you belong in does not mean much unless you put it into context. I think you claimed that the top 1% own 90% of the wealth (which I disagree with), but you fail to state how much wealth there is - how big is the pie?
      If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

      The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. John Adams

      Comment

      • Tomche Makedonche
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 1123

        #93
        Originally posted by DraganOfStip View Post
        Yes,as I said no one can deny the role of the pre-1991 system,but just look at the examples I gave you.
        Former Eastern block countries (which had an even more opressive style of communism) are far better than Macedonia is today.
        According to 2014 data,average salaries in these countries are: Slovakia 708 eur, Czech Republic 754 eur, Latvia 606, Poland 698, Estonia 871...
        Even in our closest surroundings we have Croatia with 775 eur and Slovenia with 1092 eur.
        Now,comparing these numbers with the 2000+ average salaries in most western European countries it may seem bad,but compare that with the 350 eur in Macedonia (even though it's hardly the realistic average salary since around 75% of the people receive less than that) it's far,far better.
        So you can't just attribute today's condition in Macedonia to consequences of socialism (simply because most former communist countries are doing way better),but also to the lack of leadership (I will allow myself to use our own word АПАШЛАК) and the trade embargo of the early 1990's,not forgetting also the 1999 Kosovo refugee crisis + the conflict of 2001,which also costed our economy dearly.
        In my opinion,at least.
        And yes,it perfectly fits in the "idiotism" label too.
        Well I think we can both agree that the current economic situation of an individual country can be attributed to a number of individual factors, usually specific to that country alone. However, whilst you like to point out the 7 or so ex-socialist European countries that have recovered reasonably well economically (which is a good thing for the people of those countries), I think limiting your point on average monthly salaries to only those select countries does not provide a total reflection of the current economic situation the majority of people in ex-socialist countries in Europe experience.

        In light of the above, and in the interests of providing a more complete picture, I have listed below the current average monthly net wages of other ex-socialist European republics.

        Albania
        €353

        Bulgaria
        €356

        Romania
        €417

        Moldova
        €181

        Armenia
        €314

        Azerbaijan
        €319

        Belarus
        €308

        Georgia
        €307

        Kazakhstan
        €310

        Kosovo
        €360

        Lithuania
        €554

        Ukraine
        €141

        Russia
        €395

        Bosnia Herzegovina
        €425

        Serbia
        €363

        Whether any current economic trends amongst the above countries listed can be attributed to the effects of socialism, I’ll leave for others to debate, however, as I said previously, I am personally of the opinion that the effects of socialism in Macedonia (specifically), has had a significant impact on the way Macedonians view the role government plays over the administration of their lives, including the disconnection of accountability between the citizenry and government.
        Last edited by Tomche Makedonche; 09-21-2015, 09:34 PM.
        “There’s a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part, you can’t even passively take part, and you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus and you’ve got to make it stop, and you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all” - Mario Savio

        Comment

        • Vangelovski
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 8531

          #94
          I'm digging around a little deeper on this whole Nordic model and I'm even less convinced of its relative merit.

          Firstly, no country even comes close to the net national wealth of the United States:


          images

          The Nordic countries don't even make it into the top ten and some of them don't even make it into the top 30 (according to these estimates).

          In terms of mean wealth per adult, only Norway ranks higher than the US. Sweden is roughly on par, while the others fall behind:


          pic upload

          This does not suggest to me that the Nordic economic systems are somehow economically more productive relative to the US or other capitalist countries.
          If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

          The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. John Adams

          Comment

          • Vangelovski
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2008
            • 8531

            #95
            Originally posted by Tomche Makedonche View Post
            Well I think we can both agree that the current economic situation of an individual country can be attributed to a number of individual factors, usually specific to that country alone. However, whilst you like to point out the 7 or so ex-socialist European countries that have recovered reasonably well economically (which is a good thing for the people of those countries), I think limiting your point on average monthly salaries to only those select countries does not provide a total reflection of the current economic situation the majority of people in ex-socialist countries in Europe experience.

            In light of the above, and in the interests of providing a more complete picture, I have listed below the current average monthly net wages of other ex-socialist European republics.

            Albania
            €353

            Bulgaria
            €356

            Romania
            €417

            Moldova
            €181

            Armenia
            €314

            Azerbaijan
            €319

            Belarus
            €308

            Georgia
            €307

            Kazakhstan
            €310

            Kosovo
            €360

            Lithuania
            €554

            Ukraine
            €141

            Russia
            €395

            Bosnia Herzegovina
            €425

            Serbia
            €363

            Whether any current economic trends amongst the above countries listed can be attributed to the effects of socialism, I’ll leave for others to debate, however, as I said previously, I am personally of the opinion that the effects of socialism in Macedonia (specifically), has had a significant impact on the way Macedonians view the role government plays over the administration of their lives, including the disconnection of accountability between the citizenry and government.
            Here's GDP per capita - West vs East:


            post image
            If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

            The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. John Adams

            Comment

            • Risto the Great
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 15658

              #96
              Originally posted by Vangelovski View Post
              Here's GDP per capita - West vs East:


              post image
              Surely Macao is the cradle of communism!

              I looked up the same statistics. Looking at average earnings without looking at GDP seems to be only telling half the story. I would contend that the countries that missed out on the benefits of the industrial revolution of the 18th and 19th centuries were more likely to be at the bottom of the list. Not sure we can blame the commies for everything, though I am sure some of that stench has stuck.
              Risto the Great
              MACEDONIA:ANHEDONIA
              "Holding my breath for the revolution."

              Hey, I wrote a bestseller. Check it out: www.ren-shen.com

              Comment

              • Gocka
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2012
                • 2306

                #97
                Numbers are not your forte my friend.

                So lets start out with the first chart. Net wealth in billions. I'm going to assume that this basically means the net worth of all assets held by citizens of each country.

                In any comparison its always important to make sure you compare apples to apples. In this case in order for the numbers to make any sense you first need to account for population differences. Sweden for example has only 9.5 million residents compared to the USA which has 320 million. A quick calculation shows that if Sweden were the size of the USA its wealth would be 82054 billion which would basically put it level with the USA in new wealth. So we've established the wealth per capita is basically the same. Now lets dive into some specifics. The USA is blessed with an abundance of resources, almost every type of resource on the planet can be found in the USA. Oil, gas, coal, farmland, coasts, rivers, iron, copper, silver, gold, timber, minerals, you name it they have. You can grow anything, tropical foods in Florida and California, corn, wheat, and potatoes in the Midwest, cold weather foods in the north west. No other country on the planet, other than maybe Russia (limited to energy and minerals) can boast so much variety and quantity of resources. Even China which is a massive land mass, has only a tiny fraction of the resources, primarily energy that the USA has. What does this all mean? It means that no matter what kind of system you Have in place, the USA has a massive advantage to create wealth, it has shit to sell. Now what if you confined the USA to only one region within its current borders, what if the USA was only the Midwest, or only the north east, or only the west or south? Sweden on the other hand has very limited resources, it exports 0 oil. So it has to work much harder to generate economic activity. Still it manages to hold as much wealth per capita as the USA, that has basically every competitive advantage possible over Sweden. So Sweden for "communist nightmare" is actually quite the capitalist. Frankly after being forced by you to actually dig deeper, I was surprised at whole wealthy they are, and how well they have done with so few resources.

                Norway either divided per capita (5 million citizens) or multiplied up to the US population, is actually wealthier than the USA at 86080.

                Denmark is the weakest of the Nordic trio with a scaled wealth of 71500. Putting it still firmly right behind the USA and Sweden with Norway leading.

                Japan 58,400

                China 4897 (third on the chart) but in real terms is probably near the bottom. This is a perfect illustration of why simply posting numbers, charts, and statistics, without context, or details is utterly useless and misleading.

                France 74200 (another supposed socialist hell hole not far behind the USA while again also not have a fraction of the resources and having many times more government benefits and very low amounts of hours worked.

                Canada 68571 Another socialist hell hole not too far behind the USA with a single payer healthcare system

                Switzerland, 142000, not that is not a typo, they have 70% more wealth per capita than the USA. Again a country with strong social benefits or a Social Democracy.

                Netherlands 51000

                Belgium 73570

                Austria 57300

                Some of these are land locked and most have no natural resources to speak of and significant restrictions on what can be planted and produced, yet they still maintain high levels of wealth and social benefits. The USA ranks last in social benefits among the those top few.

                So thank you for proving that some socialist ideas, can be successfully implemented and integrated with capitalist economies.

                I wonder how well the USA would do if it were the size of Macedonia, land locked with no energy or minerals. They would probably eat each other.

                The second chart is a better way of looking at it which is basically what I calculated above, the only difference it says per Adult instead of per capita. Again context. Europe has an aging population, a larger proportion of their total population is an "adult" and that means you mathematically they are disadvantaged by that kind of calculation yet still Norway ranks higher than the USA and Sweden almost on par.

                Clearly the number show that despite Norway being "socialist" it hasn't harmed personal wealth, and economic success. I have to again stress it is amazing how well they do with in such a limited ability.

                There is a reason you never see Swedish or Norwegian people other than tourists, its pretty nice where they come from.

                Finally I'd even dispute the validity or at a minimum the relevance of these figures given that Greece, GREECE, let me say that again GREECE when factoring for population is 30,000??? So the the average Greek has 2.7 times less wealth than an American? Greece is a mere step above Macedonia in terms of salaries and wealth,

                Do you have any more nice charts to share?


                Originally posted by Vangelovski View Post
                I'm digging around a little deeper on this whole Nordic model and I'm even less convinced of its relative merit.

                Firstly, no country even comes close to the net national wealth of the United States:


                images

                The Nordic countries don't even make it into the top ten and some of them don't even make it into the top 30 (according to these estimates).

                In terms of mean wealth per adult, only Norway ranks higher than the US. Sweden is roughly on par, while the others fall behind:


                pic upload

                This does not suggest to me that the Nordic economic systems are somehow economically more productive relative to the US or other capitalist countries.

                Comment

                • George S.
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 10116

                  #98
                  So what happened to the thousands of tons of gold thats in the ground on rom territory or is that a bs claim.Wouldnt that raise the gdp.
                  "Ido not want an uprising of people that would leave me at the first failure, I want revolution with citizens able to bear all the temptations to a prolonged struggle, what, because of the fierce political conditions, will be our guide or cattle to the slaughterhouse"
                  GOTSE DELCEV

                  Comment

                  • Gocka
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 2306

                    #99
                    I dont know, I think there may be, and if there is not than there should be. Its a pointless question which you have latched onto like a leech. At worst its an idealized scenario, which is not unlike most of what you say.

                    Originally posted by Vangelovski View Post
                    Its not a question of only doing things that have been done before. Its a question of your suggestion working in practice. I gave you an example from Australia. There are many other examples across the world. So it has been tried unsuccessfully. Can you provide an example where it has been successful?

                    Comment

                    • Gocka
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 2306

                      This time all the Nordic countries and even Australia made it ahead of the USA, and Ireland is right behind. Again the numbers are not in favor of your argument. Despite supposed horrible socialistic polices the Nordic countries boast better GDP per capita, which is the same as what you like to call "productivity". So I guess they are not just a bunch of lazy welfare suckers, but actually more productive than capitalist Americans, with limitless potential and resources.

                      Originally posted by Vangelovski View Post
                      Here's GDP per capita - West vs East:


                      post image

                      Comment

                      • DraganOfStip
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 1253

                        Originally posted by Gocka View Post
                        Numbers are not your forte my friend.

                        So lets start out with the first chart. Net wealth in billions. I'm going to assume that this basically means the net worth of all assets held by citizens of each country.

                        In any comparison its always important to make sure you compare apples to apples. In this case in order for the numbers to make any sense you first need to account for population differences. Sweden for example has only 9.5 million residents compared to the USA which has 320 million. A quick calculation shows that if Sweden were the size of the USA its wealth would be 82054 billion which would basically put it level with the USA in new wealth. So we've established the wealth per capita is basically the same. Now lets dive into some specifics. The USA is blessed with an abundance of resources, almost every type of resource on the planet can be found in the USA. Oil, gas, coal, farmland, coasts, rivers, iron, copper, silver, gold, timber, minerals, you name it they have. You can grow anything, tropical foods in Florida and California, corn, wheat, and potatoes in the Midwest, cold weather foods in the north west. No other country on the planet, other than maybe Russia (limited to energy and minerals) can boast so much variety and quantity of resources. Even China which is a massive land mass, has only a tiny fraction of the resources, primarily energy that the USA has. What does this all mean? It means that no matter what kind of system you Have in place, the USA has a massive advantage to create wealth, it has shit to sell. Now what if you confined the USA to only one region within its current borders, what if the USA was only the Midwest, or only the north east, or only the west or south? Sweden on the other hand has very limited resources, it exports 0 oil. So it has to work much harder to generate economic activity. Still it manages to hold as much wealth per capita as the USA, that has basically every competitive advantage possible over Sweden. So Sweden for "communist nightmare" is actually quite the capitalist. Frankly after being forced by you to actually dig deeper, I was surprised at whole wealthy they are, and how well they have done with so few resources.

                        Norway either divided per capita (5 million citizens) or multiplied up to the US population, is actually wealthier than the USA at 86080.

                        Denmark is the weakest of the Nordic trio with a scaled wealth of 71500. Putting it still firmly right behind the USA and Sweden with Norway leading.

                        Japan 58,400

                        China 4897 (third on the chart) but in real terms is probably near the bottom. This is a perfect illustration of why simply posting numbers, charts, and statistics, without context, or details is utterly useless and misleading.

                        France 74200 (another supposed socialist hell hole not far behind the USA while again also not have a fraction of the resources and having many times more government benefits and very low amounts of hours worked.

                        Canada 68571 Another socialist hell hole not too far behind the USA with a single payer healthcare system

                        Switzerland, 142000, not that is not a typo, they have 70% more wealth per capita than the USA. Again a country with strong social benefits or a Social Democracy.

                        Netherlands 51000

                        Belgium 73570

                        Austria 57300

                        Some of these are land locked and most have no natural resources to speak of and significant restrictions on what can be planted and produced, yet they still maintain high levels of wealth and social benefits. The USA ranks last in social benefits among the those top few.

                        So thank you for proving that some socialist ideas, can be successfully implemented and integrated with capitalist economies.

                        I wonder how well the USA would do if it were the size of Macedonia, land locked with no energy or minerals. They would probably eat each other.

                        The second chart is a better way of looking at it which is basically what I calculated above, the only difference it says per Adult instead of per capita. Again context. Europe has an aging population, a larger proportion of their total population is an "adult" and that means you mathematically they are disadvantaged by that kind of calculation yet still Norway ranks higher than the USA and Sweden almost on par.

                        Clearly the number show that despite Norway being "socialist" it hasn't harmed personal wealth, and economic success. I have to again stress it is amazing how well they do with in such a limited ability.

                        There is a reason you never see Swedish or Norwegian people other than tourists, its pretty nice where they come from.

                        Finally I'd even dispute the validity or at a minimum the relevance of these figures given that Greece, GREECE, let me say that again GREECE when factoring for population is 30,000??? So the the average Greek has 2.7 times less wealth than an American? Greece is a mere step above Macedonia in terms of salaries and wealth.

                        This time all the Nordic countries and even Australia made it ahead of the USA, and Ireland is right behind. Again the numbers are not in favor of your argument. Despite supposed horrible socialistic polices the Nordic countries boast better GDP per capita, which is the same as what you like to call "productivity". So I guess they are not just a bunch of lazy welfare suckers, but actually more productive than capitalist Americans, with limitless potential and resources.
                        Couldn't explain that better myself
                        I would also add that Nordic countries have about 9 months of winter per year due to geography,which also adds to the limits of natural resources exploitation...
                        Last edited by DraganOfStip; 09-22-2015, 04:00 AM.
                        ”A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices”
                        ― George Orwell

                        Comment

                        • DraganOfStip
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 1253

                          Originally posted by Tomche Makedonche View Post
                          Well I think we can both agree that the current economic situation of an individual country can be attributed to a number of individual factors, usually specific to that country alone. However, whilst you like to point out the 7 or so ex-socialist European countries that have recovered reasonably well economically (which is a good thing for the people of those countries), I think limiting your point on average monthly salaries to only those select countries does not provide a total reflection of the current economic situation the majority of people in ex-socialist countries in Europe experience.

                          In light of the above, and in the interests of providing a more complete picture, I have listed below the current average monthly net wages of other ex-socialist European republics.

                          Albania
                          €353

                          Bulgaria
                          €356

                          Romania
                          €417

                          Moldova
                          €181

                          Armenia
                          €314

                          Azerbaijan
                          €319

                          Belarus
                          €308

                          Georgia
                          €307

                          Kazakhstan
                          €310

                          Kosovo
                          €360

                          Lithuania
                          €554

                          Ukraine
                          €141

                          Russia
                          €395

                          Bosnia Herzegovina
                          €425

                          Serbia
                          €363

                          Whether any current economic trends amongst the above countries listed can be attributed to the effects of socialism, I’ll leave for others to debate, however, as I said previously, I am personally of the opinion that the effects of socialism in Macedonia (specifically), has had a significant impact on the way Macedonians view the role government plays over the administration of their lives, including the disconnection of accountability between the citizenry and government.
                          Like I said,i didn't say it hasn't had it's fair share.
                          I don't think you read my posts correctly,I haven't denied that.
                          Having said that,from what you posted above,just a handful of those countries have less average salary than Macedonia.
                          Hell,even shitholes like Kosovo and Bosnia have salaries above Macedonian average,something that's very disappointing and sad to see.
                          What I was saying was that with the right people and right reforms countries have recovered quite well.
                          Something we're yet to see in our republic.
                          Last edited by DraganOfStip; 09-22-2015, 04:02 AM.
                          ”A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices”
                          ― George Orwell

                          Comment

                          • Phoenix
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 4671

                            Originally posted by Vangelovski View Post
                            I'm digging around a little deeper on this whole Nordic model and I'm even less convinced of its relative merit.

                            Firstly, no country even comes close to the net national wealth of the United States:


                            images

                            The Nordic countries don't even make it into the top ten and some of them don't even make it into the top 30 (according to these estimates).

                            In terms of mean wealth per adult, only Norway ranks higher than the US. Sweden is roughly on par, while the others fall behind:


                            pic upload

                            This does not suggest to me that the Nordic economic systems are somehow economically more productive relative to the US or other capitalist countries.
                            Good ol' Uncle Tom...excessively arse kissing the USA.
                            Last edited by Phoenix; 09-22-2015, 02:01 AM.

                            Comment

                            • DraganOfStip
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 1253

                              Originally posted by 777Bitola View Post
                              He has good ideas but the biggest thing throwing me off is that he admitted the wealthy could be taxed up to 90%. Now I admit I'm not wealthy, but I work hard every day to try and become the top 1% and in 5-10 years or in my early 30s I'd hope to be that way , so this definetly discourages me with voting for him.
                              So you're planning on winning the lottary soon ?
                              ”A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims... but accomplices”
                              ― George Orwell

                              Comment

                              • Vangelovski
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2008
                                • 8531

                                Originally posted by Gocka View Post
                                I dont know, I think there may be, and if there is not than there should be. Its a pointless question which you have latched onto like a leech. At worst its an idealized scenario, which is not unlike most of what you say.
                                A pointless question - its your ideal and when the question arises as to whether its possible or its been done, all of a sudden its a pointless question?
                                Last edited by Vangelovski; 09-22-2015, 04:17 AM.
                                If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sins and restore their land. 2 Chronicles 7:14

                                The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution. John Adams

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X