Macedonia: Early-Mid Ottoman Period (1500-1800)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Soldier of Macedon
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 13675

    Macedonia: Early-Mid Ottoman Period (1500-1800)

    With the assumption of control in the Balkans by the Ottomans, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia had its widespread power and influence marginalised, while the Patriarchate of Constantinople found itself in a rejuvenated position resulting from its new found friendship with the recently arrived Muslim overlords. With the renewal of the Archbishopric of Pech in Serbia in the year 1557, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia began to lose even more ground and traditional territories, however, the Macedonian people stood firm behind their church and the main foe continued to be the Turk. Tensions between the Macedonian Christians and Ottoman Muslims increased significantly from the 1560's onwards, which saw places like Debar, Ohrid, Tetovo, Gostivar, Skopje, Prilep, Mariovo, etc explode in sporadic revolt and resistance against the foreign oppressor.



    In 1571 a group of about 300 well-armed Christian rebels who had refused to pay taxes for the last two years banded together near the village of Ezerani and stormed the Ottomans. This rebellion too was instigated by the priests of Venice through the consultation of archbishop Atanasij I from Ohrid. This particular rebellion lasted longer than expected due to lack of Ottoman resources to quell it...........
    In the same year, 1571, the Ottoman navy was destroyed near Corinth by Don John of Austria, a victory which encouraged the local populace around the Aegean mainland and the islands to rebel against the Ottoman overlords. One of the Macedonians that partook in the anti-Ottoman movement on the side of the Venetians was actually responsible for the death of Müezzinzade Ali, and was subsequently knighted for his deed and provided with financial reward by Don John of Austria. Although Ottoman authority was swiftly re-established in the south, the rebellions emanating from Ohrid in western Macedonia continued to expand to adjacent regions such as Prespa as late as 1573.

    The autonomous status of the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia was always a source of contention with the Patriarchate of Constantinople, and the latter's close relations with the Ottomans resulted in the rebellious Macedonians and neighbouring Slavic peoples looking towards Russia, Austria, and the Roman West for assistance. In the year 1589, the Archbishop of Ohrid, Gavril, wrote to Ferdinand the Archduke of Habsburg, and spoke of how "the Turk, who from day to day has pursued and blackmailed us and our ancestors ....in the whole of Macedonia, Greece and the nearby countries...then among our countries we have Bulgaria, Serbia, Macedonia....". Once again, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia was engaged in activities in support of the local population. Due to certain efforts at collaboration against the Turks between the people of Macedonia and Albania, who were often unified under the 'guidance' of Catholic Roman clergy, a letter sent by an 'Albanian' to Pope Clement VIII in the year 1593 was imprinted with a title that read Stamp of the Kingdom of Macedonia and Albania. (Stojcev, Vance. "Military History of Macedonia". P.132)
    In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a lion and a Macedonian.
  • Soldier of Macedon
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 13675

    #2
    In the year 1611 Epirus experienced a short-lived revolt led by Bishop Dionysius the Philosopher, which resulting in severe Ottoman reprisals. Peace was by no means assured as the Archbishopric of Ohrid continued to be a dominant and influental factor on the territory of Macedonia and the greater region. In a letter from Pope Urban VIII to the Archbishop of Ohrid Porphyrius Palaelogus, which was written in the year 1624, the following address is made: "To the respected brothers Porphyrius Paleologus, Patriarch of Justiniana Prima of Ohrid and the other subordinate archbishops, bishops of Bulgaria, Serbia, Albania and of the other side of Macedonia".

    The fact that the local population cited in these regions speak a Slavonic language is further corroborated in the links below from the year 1630, which cite Slavonic as the dominant tongue of the region, it is the vulgar speech of the Macedonians.

    Title page. Page 371. Page 372. Source: "Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters" by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. There were Macedonians in 1630 AD they spoke a Sclavonic(Slavic) language they were heirs to Alexander the Great. Can it get any clearer then this? We Macedonians were and will always be

    Title page. Page 373. Page 374. Source: “Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters” by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. As you readers can see for yourself, James Howell was an eyewitness to the state of things in 1630, he correctly notes that Sclavonic(Slavic) is spoken in all of Macedon(Macedonia) and that



    Another short-lived revolt against the Turks occured in the year 1639 which began in the village of Gaveto in Macedonia, but a few decades later stakes were raised as the activity of the Macedonian rebels coincided with an Austrian push southward against the common enemy. In the years prior to the Karposh Uprising, places like Bitola, Voden, Veles and Prilep had been rebelling against the Turks due to the regular injustices endured by the Christian populations. During the 1680's the Austrians did battle against the Turks and encouraged the local population under Ottoman rule to revolt. Their declarations were addressed to the Christians of "Albania, Servia, Mysia, Bulgaria, Silistria, Illyria, Macedonia and Rashka", and the Macedonians appear most emboldened by the events. Parts of the region errupted in rebellion, the most notable in Macedonia being led by Karposh the "King of Kumanovo", as another declaration by the Emperor Leopold of Austria spoke about "two Macedonians, Marko Kraida born in Kozhani and Dimitri Georgi Popovic, born in Macedonian Salonika, have told us that the Macedonian people, with respect for our most righteous task......"



    Unfortunately, the rebellion was short-lived as the Turks captured and executed Karposh while regaining control of the Macedonian regions.
    In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a lion and a Macedonian.

    Comment

    • Soldier of Macedon
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 13675

      #3
      During the early 1700's the Russians had their turn at war against the Turks, this time in Wallachia and Moldavia, where they enjoyed the support of the local Romanians. The Turks won the battle and as a form of punishment against the Romanians they instated the Phanariot Hospodars in Wallachia and Moldavia.


      The Russian Czar Petar sent proclamations to the "Albanians, Macedonians, and Bosnians who were subject to the porte".......
      It is very likely that another local uprising in Macedonia took place in 1739, as the battle between the Turks and the European Powers continued intermittently, while the Macedonian population had shown itself quite welcoming to revolt and emboldened by Russian efforts and proclamations towards them and other Orthodox Balkan people.


      In the eighteenth century, the Ottomans fought a series of wars with European powers. Between 1714 and 1718, they fought with the small country of Venice; between 1736 and 1739, they fought with Austria and Russia in order to stop the expansion of these powers into Muslim territories.
      After the peace treaty with the European Powers the Turks inflicted a severely harsh reprisal on the Macedonians, which prompted some of the first signs of emigration into Austria and Russia. Several Christians of the Ottoman Empire made requests for emigration to Russia, and in the year 1751 these requests were granted to Macedonians, Serbs, Vlachs and Bulgarians. The following year in 1752 infantry regiments were established within the Russian army which were divided according to nationality, described in a Russian royal edict as the "Orthodox Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian and Vlach peoples”.

      In the year 1757 Montenegrin Metropolitan Vasilije Petrovic wrote a letter to the Russian Count Shuvalov expressing the feelings of the “Albanians, Macedonians, Bosnians, Serbs and Bulgarians”, who viewed Russia as the great Orthodox Slavic power and their saviour from the Turks. The Macedonians in the Russian regiments were still active in the mid 1760's as a number of them were sent back into Balkan lands to fight for the cause of freedom from the Turks.


      As a result the possibility to form the two additional regiments in new Serbia was created: Macedonian and Bulgarian field hussar from the unmarried and lonely people, which did not wish to manage in the settling.
      Meanwhile, the increase of Austrian power in the region also made it a safe haven for Christian fugitives from the Ottoman Empire, particularly during the years 1765-66, as the struggle of the Macedonians, Serbs, Bosnians and others against the Turks became relentless. The strength and attraction of the powerful empires belonging to Austria and Russia were to assist in sustaining the hope of the Christians in the Ottoman Empire during the 18th and 19th centuries.


      All these fugitives, Uskoks....Albanians, Macedonians, Serbians and Wallachians, were hospitably received in Austria, and settled as beforein...the Banat, for the defence of the frontier.
      During these turbulent times the Greek-speaking Romans appear to be missing from most if not all of these rebellions, and instead of joining their Christian brothers in revolt they were forging closer ties with the Ottoman Turks. The endless uprising initiated by the Macedonians and other Orthodox Slavic and Latin peoples in the region had turned the Turks sharply against this part of the Ottoman population. That the Turks showed favour to these Greek-speaking Romans as a result of the latter's obedience (and greed for control among Christians) is evident in two things above all - Phanariot domination in Wallachia and Moldavia, and the forced cessation of Romanian and Slavic-speaking church liturgy and schools during the 1766-67 in the Balkans.

      The Macedonians were quite brave and lively even after these events during the 1780's when they were met by Baron De Tott, who speaks of "twenty-two Macedonians, each with his musket on his shoulder, went thither, and met in a tavern, where they sang the victories of Alexander". However, from this period onwards assimilative propaganda in the Balkans and among the Balkan people spread, and it was chiefly orchestrated by the Greek-speaking Romans.
      In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a lion and a Macedonian.

      Comment

      • TrueMacedonian
        Banned
        • Jan 2009
        • 3823

        #4
        Originally posted by Soldier of Macedon View Post
        With the assumption of control in the Balkans by the Ottomans, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia had its widespread power and influence marginalised, while the Patriarchate of Constantinople found itself in a rejuvenated position resulting from its new found friendship with the recently arrived Muslim overlords. With the renewal of the Archbishopric of Pech in Serbia in the year 1557, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia began to lose even more ground and traditional territories, however, the Macedonian people stood firm behind their church and the main foe continued to be the Turk. Tensions between the Macedonian Christians and Ottoman Muslims increased significantly from the 1560's onwards, which saw places like Debar, Ohrid, Tetovo, Gostivar, Skopje, Prilep, Mariovo, etc explode in sporadic revolt and resistance against the foreign oppressor.




        In the same year, 1571, the Ottoman navy was destroyed near Corinth by Don John of Austria, a victory which encouraged the local populace around the Aegean mainland and the islands to rebel against the Ottoman overlords. Although Ottoman authority was swiftly re-established in the south, the rebellions emanating from Ohrid in western Macedonia continued to expand to adjacent regions such as Prespa as late as 1573.

        The autonomous status of the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia was always a source of conention with the Patriarchate of Constantinople, and the latter's close relations with the Ottomans resulted in the rebellious Macedonians and neighbouring Slavic peoples looking towards Russia, Austria, and the Roman West for assistance. In the year 1589, the Archbishop of Ohrid, Gavril, wrote to Ferdinand the Archduke of Habsburg, speak of how "the Turk, who from day to day has pursued and blackmailed us and our ancestors ....in the whole of Macedonia, Greece and the nearby countries...then among our countries we have Bulgaria, Serbia, Macedonia....". Once again, the Archbishopric of Ohrid in Macedonia was engaged in activities in support of the local population. Due to certain efforts at collaboration against the Turks between the people of Macedonia and Albania, who were often unified under the 'guidance' of Catholic Roman clergy, a letter sent by an 'Albanian' to Pope Clement VIII in the year 1593 was imprinted with a title that read Stamp of the Kingdom of Macedonia and Albania. (Stojcev, Vance. "Military History of Macedonia". P.132)

        This is a very good breakdown of this period. SoM you have a knack for creating these chronological threads. So here's something I hope you add into what I made bold in your post.





        A Macedonian killed Müezzinzade Ali and was Knighted (I don't know why I didn't highlight that part) by Don John (Don Juan) of Austria.

        Comment

        • Soldier of Macedon
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2008
          • 13675

          #5
          Excellent, I will update accordingly soon.
          In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a lion and a Macedonian.

          Comment

          • Balanced
            Junior Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 4

            #6
            Amazing, I didn't know how much the Macedonians rebelled. From my reading:
            1) The Archbishop of Ohrid had immense power in the region, organizing revolts across the entire Balkans.
            2) It seems Patriarchate of Constantinople didn't care for the freedom of the people, they simply wanted to take power away from the Archbishop of Ohrid in order to achieve their own agenda.
            3) The amount of Christian Albanians must have been immense, much more then is stated today. It seems they have fought with the Macedonians in most of the rebellions. My guess is the assimilation processes of Greece has reduced the amount of Christian Albanians significantly.
            4) As with Macedonians helping the countries of Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria during the first Balkan War, Macedonians fought with other powers such as Venice, Austria and Russia in order to achieve freedom.

            Comment

            • Soldier of Macedon
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 13675

              #7
              Originally posted by Balanced View Post
              Amazing, I didn't know how much the Macedonians rebelled. From my reading:
              1) The Archbishop of Ohrid had immense power in the region, organizing revolts across the entire Balkans.
              2) It seems Patriarchate of Constantinople didn't care for the freedom of the people, they simply wanted to take power away from the Archbishop of Ohrid in order to achieve their own agenda.
              3) The amount of Christian Albanians must have been immense, much more then is stated today. It seems they have fought with the Macedonians in most of the rebellions. My guess is the assimilation processes of Greece has reduced the amount of Christian Albanians significantly.
              4) As with Macedonians helping the countries of Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria during the first Balkan War, Macedonians fought with other powers such as Venice, Austria and Russia in order to achieve freedom.
              All good observations, with point one, I would say that the Archbishopric of Ohrid more often supported rather than initiated local revolts and movements.
              Originally posted by TrueMacedonian
              This is a very good breakdown of this period. SoM you have a knack for creating these chronological threads. So here's something I hope you add into what I made bold in your post.
              Done.
              In the name of the blood and the sun, the dagger and the gun, Christ protect this soldier, a lion and a Macedonian.

              Comment

              • Serdarot
                Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 605

                #8
                Originally posted by Balanced View Post
                ...
                1) The Archbishop of Ohrid had immense power in the region, organizing revolts across the entire Balkans.
                2) It seems Patriarchate of Constantinople didn't care for the freedom of the people, they simply wanted to take power away from the Archbishop of Ohrid in order to achieve their own agenda.
                3) The amount of Christian Albanians must have been immense, much more then is stated today. It seems they have fought with the Macedonians in most of the rebellions. My guess is the assimilation processes of Greece has reduced the amount of Christian Albanians significantly.
                4) As with Macedonians helping the countries of Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria during the first Balkan War, Macedonians fought with other powers such as Venice, Austria and Russia in order to achieve freedom.
                1. one of the reasons why the Sultan, against all Church Rules (Kanoni), made the decision to shut it down
                2. exactly, or to simplify it: they wanted the tax money and the power Ohrid had
                3. many western writers were calling the Macedonians "Albanians", from various reasons. The "original" Albanians fought against the Turks (probably) as well, but if you compare several sources for later periods, it is clear that big percent of the population on the teritories of today Albania were Macedonians.
                4. some did it for money. some with hope for Freedom and better life. look on today´s "peacekeepers" and mercenaries...


                @SoM and TM: nice i guess each time they (the "greeks" and "bulgars") are reading "the Macedonian" , a knife of envy is stabing their dirty hearts
                Bratot:
                Никој не е вечен, а каузава не е нова само е адаптирана на новите услови и ќе се пренесува и понатаму.

                Comment

                • TrueMacedonian
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 3823

                  #9
                  During the early 1700's the Russians had their turn at war against the Turks, this time in Wallachia and Moldavia, where they enjoyed the support of the local Romanians. The Turks won the battle and as a form of punishment against the Romanians they instated the Phanariot Hospodars in Wallachia and Moldavia.
                  It seems that this certain period in Macedonia's history is marked by revolt. Here's something I hope you consider adding into the chronological order you have already established SoM;




                  Lesok is in the Tetovo region. My theory http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum...p?t=948&page=5 is that a majority of these revolts centered in the Northernly areas of Macedonia.
                  Last edited by TrueMacedonian; 08-21-2010, 03:31 PM.

                  Comment

                  • The LION will ROAR
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 3231

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Soldier of Macedon View Post
                    In the year 1611 Epirus experienced a short-lived revolt led by Bishop Dionysius the Philosopher, which resulting in severe Ottoman reprisals. Peace was by no means assured as the Archbishopric of Ohrid continued to be a dominant and influental factor on the territory of Macedonia and the greater region. In a letter from Pope Urban VIII to the Archbishop of Ohrid Porphyrius Palaelogus, which was written in the year 1624, the following address is made: "To the respected brothers Porphyrius Paleologus, Patriarch of Justiniana Prima of Ohrid and the other subordinate archbishops, bishops of Bulgaria, Serbia, Albania and of the other side of Macedonia".

                    The fact that the local population cited in these regions speak a Slavonic language is further corroborated in the links below from the year 1630, which cite Slavonic as the dominant tongue of the region, it is the vulgar speech of the Macedonians.

                    Title page. Page 371. Page 372. Source: "Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters" by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. There were Macedonians in 1630 AD they spoke a Sclavonic(Slavic) language they were heirs to Alexander the Great. Can it get any clearer then this? We Macedonians were and will always be

                    Title page. Page 373. Page 374. Source: “Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters” by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. As you readers can see for yourself, James Howell was an eyewitness to the state of things in 1630, he correctly notes that Sclavonic(Slavic) is spoken in all of Macedon(Macedonia) and that



                    Another short-lived revolt against the Turks occured in the year 1639 which began in the village of Gaveto in Macedonia, but a few decades later stakes were raised as the activity of the Macedonian rebels coincided with an Austrian push southward against the common enemy. In the years prior to the Karposh Uprising, places like Bitola, Voden, Veles and Prilep had been rebelling against the Turks due to the regular injustices endured by the Christian populations. During the 1680's the Austrians did battle against the Turks and encouraged the local population under Ottoman rule to revolt. Their declarations were addressed to the Christians of "Albania, Servia, Mysia, Bulgaria, Silistria, Illyria, Macedonia and Rashka", and the Macedonians appear most emboldened by the events. Parts of the region errupted in rebellion, the most notable in Macedonia being led by Karposh the "King of Kumanovo", as another declaration by the Emperor Leopold of Austria spoke about "two Macedonians, Marko Kraida born in Kozhani and Dimitri Georgi Popovic, born in Macedonian Salonika, have told us that the Macedonian people, with respect for our most righteous task......"



                    Unfortunately, the rebellion was short-lived as the Turks captured and executed Karposh while regaining control of the Macedonian regions.
                    Писмо на австpoyнгарскиот император Леополд I, 26. IV 1690.

                    Соопштувам дека од двајца Македонци: Димитар Георги Попович од Солун и Марко Краида од Кожани добивме уверување дека македонскиот народ со почит спрема нашата праведност е целосно подготвен да ја признае нашата врховна власт. Ние сесрдно го земаме македонскиот народ целосно под наша заштита, и истиот не смее да биде нападнат од нашите трупи


                    “...Соопштувам дека од двајца Македонци: Димитар Георги Попович од Солун и Марко Краида од Кожани добивме уверување дека македонскиот народ со почит спрема нашата праведност е целосно подготвен да ја признае нашата врховна власт. Ние сесрдно го земаме македонскиот народ целосно под наша заштита, и истиот не смее да биде нападнат од нашите трупи...“


                    The Macedonians originates it, the Bulgarians imitate it and the Greeks exploit it!

                    Comment

                    • Liberator of Makedonija
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2014
                      • 1597

                      #11
                      Originally posted by TrueMacedonian View Post
                      It seems that this certain period in Macedonia's history is marked by revolt. Here's something I hope you consider adding into the chronological order you have already established SoM;




                      Lesok is in the Tetovo region. My theory http://www.macedoniantruth.org/forum...p?t=948&page=5 is that a majority of these revolts centered in the Northernly areas of Macedonia.

                      Would you recommend this book?
                      I know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.

                      Comment

                      • VMRO
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 1462

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Liberator of Makedonija View Post
                        Would you recommend this book?

                        I read it 10+ years ago, it's a good book.
                        Verata vo Mislite, VMRO vo dushata, Makedonia vo Srceto.

                        Vnatreshna Makedonska Revolucionerna Organizacija.

                        Comment

                        • Liberator of Makedonija
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2014
                          • 1597

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Soldier of Macedon View Post
                          In the year 1611 Epirus experienced a short-lived revolt led by Bishop Dionysius the Philosopher, which resulting in severe Ottoman reprisals. Peace was by no means assured as the Archbishopric of Ohrid continued to be a dominant and influental factor on the territory of Macedonia and the greater region. In a letter from Pope Urban VIII to the Archbishop of Ohrid Porphyrius Palaelogus, which was written in the year 1624, the following address is made: "To the respected brothers Porphyrius Paleologus, Patriarch of Justiniana Prima of Ohrid and the other subordinate archbishops, bishops of Bulgaria, Serbia, Albania and of the other side of Macedonia".

                          The fact that the local population cited in these regions speak a Slavonic language is further corroborated in the links below from the year 1630, which cite Slavonic as the dominant tongue of the region, it is the vulgar speech of the Macedonians.

                          Title page. Page 371. Page 372. Source: "Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters" by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. There were Macedonians in 1630 AD they spoke a Sclavonic(Slavic) language they were heirs to Alexander the Great. Can it get any clearer then this? We Macedonians were and will always be

                          Title page. Page 373. Page 374. Source: “Epistolae Ho-Elianae:Familiar letters” by James Howell, 10th edition, 1737. As you readers can see for yourself, James Howell was an eyewitness to the state of things in 1630, he correctly notes that Sclavonic(Slavic) is spoken in all of Macedon(Macedonia) and that



                          Another short-lived revolt against the Turks occured in the year 1639 which began in the village of Gaveto in Macedonia, but a few decades later stakes were raised as the activity of the Macedonian rebels coincided with an Austrian push southward against the common enemy. In the years prior to the Karposh Uprising, places like Bitola, Voden, Veles and Prilep had been rebelling against the Turks due to the regular injustices endured by the Christian populations. During the 1680's the Austrians did battle against the Turks and encouraged the local population under Ottoman rule to revolt. Their declarations were addressed to the Christians of "Albania, Servia, Mysia, Bulgaria, Silistria, Illyria, Macedonia and Rashka", and the Macedonians appear most emboldened by the events. Parts of the region errupted in rebellion, the most notable in Macedonia being led by Karposh the "King of Kumanovo", as another declaration by the Emperor Leopold of Austria spoke about "two Macedonians, Marko Kraida born in Kozhani and Dimitri Georgi Popovic, born in Macedonian Salonika, have told us that the Macedonian people, with respect for our most righteous task......"



                          Unfortunately, the rebellion was short-lived as the Turks captured and executed Karposh while regaining control of the Macedonian regions.
                          Where is Gaveto? Can't find any info on it
                          I know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.

                          Comment

                          • Karposh
                            Member
                            • Aug 2015
                            • 863

                            #14
                            I suspect it could be Gjavato, that is being referred to in the document - a Bitola village located on the slopes of Baba Planina. This used to be a very large Macedonian village back in the day. Really interesting stuff and a pity not enough information survives about this revolt as I'm sure it would have attracted volunteers from many of the surrounding mountain villages in the area, including my own, Brusnik.

                            Comment

                            • Liberator of Makedonija
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2014
                              • 1597

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Karposh View Post
                              I suspect it could be Gjavato, that is being referred to in the document - a Bitola village located on the slopes of Baba Planina. This used to be a very large Macedonian village back in the day. Really interesting stuff and a pity not enough information survives about this revolt as I'm sure it would have attracted volunteers from many of the surrounding mountain villages in the area, including my own, Brusnik.
                              Does the village still exist?
                              I know of two tragic histories in the world- that of Ireland, and that of Macedonia. Both of them have been deprived and tormented.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X