COVID-19 Pandemic

[kompir]

New study from Germany confirms higher vax coverage --> higher excess mortality

I just got a new study from a friend in Germany (Max Langen).

What this new German study shows is: The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality.

I can’t say I’m surprised. See The more we vaccinate, the higher the number of cases.

These are the deadliest vaccine in human history by a factor of over 800. But it is always nice to get confirmation from multiple sources who have no conflicts.

The authors write (translated into English): “The correlation is + .31, is amazingly high and especially in an unexpected direction. Actually, it should be negative, so that one could say: The higher the vaccination rate, the lower the excess mortality. However, the opposite is the case and this urgently needs to be clarified. Excess mortality can be observed in all 16 countries…”

In plain English: vaccination makes things worse, not better.

I wanted to share this study with you because it might be interesting for you and maybe you want to add it to your vaccine data.

Here is the link to the original study (it will download a word docx in German).

The original German study translated into English is available as a PDF here.

And here is a news report about this study:

Bundesländer mit hoher Impfquote haben höchste Übersterblichkeit - reitschuster.de

Use Google translate plug-in to read it. It looks like this (followed by a short excerpt):

The physicist Dr. Ute Bergner , who formerly belonged to the FDP parliamentary group in the Thuringian state parliament, has meanwhile switched to the “Citizens for Thuringia” party, held on November 17. A speech in front of the Thuringian state parliament in which she presented an analysis she had commissioned .

She commissioned two statisticians to investigate whether there was a connection between the vaccination rate and excess mortality in the 16 federal states.

Prof. Dr. Rolf Steyer and Dr. Gregor Kappler analyzed the period from week 36 to week 40.

The results are alarming. The summary of the analysis states:

Excess mortality can be found in all 16 countries. The number of Covid deaths reported by the RKI in the period under review consistently only represents a relatively small part of the excess mortality and above all cannot explain the critical issue:

The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality.

The most direct explanation is:
･ Complete vaccination increases the likelihood of death.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-from-germany-confirms-higher?s=r

[Dove]

Petition EN3886 - Cessation of vaccine mandates

https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN3886

It has been stated this petition needs 100,000 signatures to be tabled before parliament. It closes on 9/3/22. It is at 62140 at last refresh. It was at around 14,000 signatures yesterday morning.

[Dove]

Israel:More Than 66% Now Suffering Adverse Vaccine Reactions, Many of Them Serious

https://adversereactionreport.com/breaking-news/israel-more-than-66-are-now-suffering-adverse-reactions-many-of-them-serious/

Israel’s Ministry of Health published data from a recent survey showing that more than 66 percent of the people in Israel who got fully injected, then “boosted,” suffered some kind of reaction to the shots that has made living normal life much more difficult.

Some 2,049 citizens were asked three to four weeks after getting a third “dose” of a Fauci Flu shot how they feel now. Most of them revealed that they feel terrible, and roughly half of them say that carrying out normal, everyday activities is now exceptionally difficult...

Can this be true? It seems extreme.

[Risto the Great]

When you see them wandering around with that air of malaise and watery eyed look .... it starts to look all too familiar. What astounds me is when the same people can't connect the dots between how they are feeling and the injections of toxic chemicals they have received.

The questioning eyes when they describe to you how the doctors can't figure out what is wrong with them.

Meanwhile, the elephant in the room just shat its pants.

[Dove]

When you see them wandering around with that air of malaise and watery eyed look .... it starts to look all too familiar. What astounds me is when the same people connect the dots between how they are feeling and the injections of toxic chemicals they have received.

Hey, that sounds like me. Did Bill get me with those mosquito shots?

[Dove]

The Pfizer docs

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

They only seem to be talking about what was already known.

[Risto the Great]

Hey, that sounds like me. Did Bill get me with those mosquito shots?

I would trust him as far as I could kick Epstein.

[Risto the Great]

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

They only seem to be talking about what was already known.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-releases-pfizer-vaccine-documents/

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday released a 10,000-page cache of documents pertaining to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

The documents provide more insights into the FDA’s process for approving the vaccine, and may also shed more light on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines and the number and nature of adverse effects that were observed during the clinical trials and the first months after the EUA was issued.

The documents were made public as part of a court-ordered release schedule stemming from an expedited Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).

PHMPT, a group of medical and public health professionals and scientists from Harvard, Yale, UCLA and other institutions, submitted the request in August 2021.

The FOIA request asked for the approximately 400,000 pages of documents pertaining to the approval of the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be made public, including safety and effectiveness data, adverse reaction reports and a list of the vaccine’s active and inactive ingredients.

When the FDA ignored the request, PHMPT sued the agency in September 2021, taking the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On Feb. 2, federal judge Mark Pittman issued an order requiring the FDA to release redacted versions of the documents in question according to the following disclosure schedule:

10,000 pages apiece, due on or before March 1 and April 1, 2022.
80,000 pages apiece, to be produced on or before May 2, June 1 and July 1, 2022.
70,000 pages to be produced on or before Aug. 1, 2022.
55,000 pages per month, on or before the first business day of each month thereafter, until the release of the documents has been completed.
The cache of documents made public on March 1, available on PHMPT’s website, represents the first release of such documents following the issuance of Pittman’s order in February.

However, the FDA released smaller sets of documents in November and December 2021 and January 2022, while the legal case was ongoing.

What do the documents reveal?

The first batch of documents, produced in November 2021 and totaling a mere 500 pages, revealed safety concerns and the fact that more than 1,200 vaccine-related deaths occurred within the first 90 days following the release of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

The documents also revealed a nine-page list of adverse events observed during that same period. The list recently was circulated widely on social media and wrongly attributed to the set of documents released March 1.

This may be because the March 1 document release garnered widespread attention among those following the issue, likely delivering traffic to PHMPT’s website, which catalogs all of the documents that have been released thus far.

Major media outlets, however, have not covered the latest release of documents and, as of this writing, there has been only limited coverage by smaller media outlets. That may be due, at least in part, to the vast volume of information and data to sort through.

Endpoints News, a publication focusing on the pharmaceutical industry, published a dismissive article regarding the release of the latest cache of documents.

The publication’s editor, Zachary Brennan, reported the documents contain mundane information that is “typical for any drug or vaccine application” and that “will give readers a good overall sense of the required documentation necessary to apply for a drug or vaccine approval at the FDA.”

Such information includes, according to Brennan, “more than 100 pages worth of anonymous safety-related tables of data” and “unidentified participants’ gender, age and BMI.”

Other documentation pertains to “the standard, nearly $2.9 million user fee payment to FDA from Pfizer” and to “the confidential nonclinical overview for the vaccine,” Brennan said.

Brennan noted some documents included in the cache, such as the fast track designation letter and Pfizer’s request for a waiver from adding a suffix to the vaccine’s name, are “not typically released” to the public.

However, aside from this relatively mundane information — whether typically released to the public or not — the latest batch of documents may contain additional revelatory information.

An initial review by The Defender of the information included in this vast set of newly released documents includes:

Details regarding animal studies that were conducted, and their findings.
Documents that appear to pertain to specific types of adverse reactions experienced by trial participants, and to COVID-19 infections in trial participants post-vaccination.
Information about the study protocol, as well as amendments that were made to this protocol.
Information about Pfizer’s internal review committee for the COVID vaccine.
The original Pfizer-BioNTech application to market the COVID vaccine, submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The sheer volume of information that must be analyzed and processed necessitates careful examination, which will be performed by the editorial staff of The Defender, with further information and any significant revelations to be published in the coming days.

A circuitous legal process and a victory for transparency

The FDA had previously argued it didn’t have enough staff to review, redact and release hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, claiming it could process only 500 pages per month.

This would have meant the cache of documents would not be fully released to the public for approximately 75 years.

In his Jan. 6 order, Pittmann rejected the FDA’s claim and instead required the agency to release 12,000 pages of documents by Jan. 31 and an additional 55,000 pages per month thereafter.

This decision was then amended by Pittman’s subsequent Feb. 2 order, truncating the release schedule to a matter of months instead of decades.

The Feb. 2 order also granted the FDA the ability to “bank” excess pages as part of this release schedule — meaning that if the agency exceeds its monthly quota in any given month it can apply those extra pages to a subsequent month.

Previously, Pfizer responded to the Jan. 6 order by filing a memorandum with the court requesting to intervene in the case to assist the FDA with the documents’ release, specifically for the “limited purpose of ensuring that information exempt from disclosure under FOIA is adequately protected as FDA complies with this Court’s order.”

Pfizer claimed to support the disclosure of the documents, but asked to intervene in the case to ensure that information legally exempt from disclosure will not be “disclosed inappropriately.”

Pittman rejected Pfizer’s bid in his Feb. 2 order.

In a related matter, Judge Michael Truncale of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Feb. 10 unsealed 400 pages of documents pertaining to a lawsuit filed by a whistleblower, Brook Jackson.

Jackson formerly worked for Ventavia, a contractor hired by Pfizer to conduct Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

Jackson’s lawsuit alleges multiple improprieties in the clinical trial process during the time that she was employed with Ventavia. The FDA declined to intervene in this case.

Some of the documents pertaining to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine that were released on March 1 appear to directly relate to the clinical trials conducted by Ventavia, and thus may shed light on Jackson’s allegations.

Not looking like much here, but to be fair, this is the first bit released and the earlier info was already terrible enough. I expect the more damaging information to be revealed at the latest time.

Aside from all that, anybody seen Fauci lately?

[Dove]

How are our Sydney-siders going? Are you on high ground or getting wet? Poor flooded Lismore is a 'smart city' apparently.

[Dove]

Bin the boosters

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-08/albury-gps-call-for-higher-booster-uptake-amid-dose-throwing/100890728

They're binning boosters and some organisations are cutting back on resources related to jabbing people but be assured Victorians, Martin Foley will look after us. "We won't rest until everyone that is eligible comes forward and gets that third-dose booster," he said.

"That is what is going to keep us open and keep us safe, particularly as we move into the colder winter months."

[Dove]

More Mosquito Talk - Hmmm

Victorian man dies from Japanese encephalitis

https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/victorian-man-dies-from-japanese-encephalitis/news-story/cf7fa2a13acdd407a87d99e85ad4ecdc

Someone suggested the jab caused this.


Billions of GMO Mosquitoes Set to Be Released in California, Florida

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/billions-gmo-mosquitoes-california-florida/

[kompir]

The mosquito release won't end well...

[Risto the Great]

The mosquito release won't end well...

They better not do that shit here. I will consider it a direct declaration of war against me and my family.

[kompir]

https://www.theage.com.au/national/sydney-covid-19-patients-developed-resistance-to-common-treatment-20220309-p5a35j.html

[Risto the Great]

I note Austria is no longer mandating the vaccine now. Cancelled the requirement 6 days before they were going to start charging people for being unvaccinated. Are you starting to understand the ruse?

Smoke and mirrors.