COVID-19 Pandemic

[Risto the Great]

Russell Brand tearing it apart.

8 mice no less .....

https://youtu.be/G9cGwZTDbWc

[Carlin]

"The WEF climate lockdowns are already starting..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oQvSNK1IpE

[kompir]

Look how nice the Aus govco is being offering to pay for the funeral for those that died from a spicy cough vaccine:

https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au...?context=55953

[Risto the Great]

Florida surgeon general said the vaccines are dangerous to men under 40. Twitter censored it, then put it back up. When the real science gets out, it will be a shit show.

[kompir]

With the exception of the US and Canada, every country around the world has abandoned the vaccine mandates.

Originally Posted by Risto the Great

Florida surgeon general said the vaccines are dangerous to men under 40. Twitter censored it, then put it back up. When the real science gets out, it will be a shit show.

I saw that, and it will set a precedent in the US.

[Karposh]

"Aussie tennis legend Todd Woodbridge, 51, suffers heart attack while exercising in home gym."

This news is about a week old now but it still amazes me how, in his response, Todd says he was really surprised that he suffered a heart attack considering his above-average fitness levels, healthy lifestyle and healthy diet. He stressed the importance of getting regular heart checks to people over 50 or nearing 50. Apparently his brothers died quite early in life because of heart failures in their 50's.

I wonder if it crossed his mind that there could be another possible reason for his heart attack. Or would that be blasphemous against the science which we all should be following without question.

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by Karposh

"Aussie tennis legend Todd Woodbridge, 51, suffers heart attack while exercising in home gym."

This news is about a week old now but it still amazes me how, in his response, Todd says he was really surprised that he suffered a heart attack considering his above-average fitness levels, healthy lifestyle and healthy diet. He stressed the importance of getting regular heart checks to people over 50 or nearing 50. Apparently his brothers died quite early in life because of heart failures in their 50's.

I wonder if it crossed his mind that there could be another possible reason for his heart attack. Or would that be blasphemous against the science which we all should be following without question.

I saw this story somewhere in the media and it referred to Woodbridge's high cholesterol levels which may have been the contributing factor to his heart issue.

I've been told that bad cholesterol levels are more influenced by genetics than they are due to lifestyle for many people, in other words even if you are eating well and exercising frequently it may still be difficult to control cholesterol.

The other point which ties into the genetic link is about his brothers having heart issues in their 50's, this is apparently the age at which many genetic disorders begin to manifest.

I'm definitely not defending the vaccines but I think this example might have nothing to do with the vaccine.

[Risto the Great]

Bad cholesterol is another myth right up there with the covid rubbish. Look up fractional LDL testing then you will begin to understand how it is all about inflammation and bodily responses to it. Oxidised LDL is problematic. Having (un)oxidised LDL is perfect and your body will make as much as it needs of it with the right diet.

I'd say the vaccine encourages this kind of bodily response. But a high carb diet wouldn't help either.

When you think of selling a few covid jabs, imagine signing someone up for 40 years of cholesterol reducing tablets. Possibly a greater scam than the covid jabs.

Just for fun, do your own survey and see who is losing their mind in a demented way after years of taking statins. Pure evil .... I could go on

[Risto the Great]

Lab in Boston Made What Could Be A Super-Killer SARS-COV-2
Extreme Danger: This is Gain-of-Function Research on Steroids

https://viralimmunologist.substack.c...m_medium=email

Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Oct 18

I was in shock when a couple of my colleagues directed me to a pre-print article that was posted online on Friday October 14, 2022. Pre-prints are scientific papers that have not yet undergone peer review and they have not been published in a journal. In this case, these nuances are moot. What is far more important is the product that has been described, along with the disclosure of the recipe to make it.
You can find the pre-print article at this link.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...m_medium=email


Here is the full citation:
Title: “Role of spike in the pathogenic and antigenic behavior of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 Omicron”
Authors: Da-Yuan Chen, Devin Kenney, Chue Vin Chin, Alexander H. Tavares, Nazimuddin Khan, Hasahn L. Conway, GuanQun Liu, Manish C. Choudhary, Hans P. Gertje, Aoife K. O’Connell, Darrell N. Kotton, Alexandra Herrmann, Armin Ensser, John H. Connor, Markus Bosmann, Jonathan Z. Li, Michaela U. Gack, Susan C. Baker, Robert N. Kirchdoerfer, Yachana Kataria, Nicholas A. Crossland, Florian Douam, Mohsan Saeed
bioRxiv 2022.10.13.512134
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.13.512134
COVID Chronicles is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The Purported Intent of the Research
The bulk of the research, and the most dangerous aspects, were conducted at Boston University in Massachusetts, USA. In a nutshell, the authors made a ‘chimeric’ version of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is the causative agent of the coronavirus disease that was first identified in 2019 (COVID-19). A chimera is a combination of two different biological entities. For example, my academic institution’s mascot is a gryphon, which is a combination of a lion and an eagle…


In the case of the paper in question, they made a SARS-CoV-2 that was part Omicron variant (the spike protein) and part ‘ancestral’ variant (meaning it was a variant from earlier in the declared pandemic). Apparently, they were trying to figure out what role the spike protein has played in the ability of the Omicron variant to escape the far-from-sterilizing COVID-19 jab-induced immune responses, as well as its role in pathogenicity (how the virus causes disease).
Here it is in the authors’ words:

“We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant.”

I don’t care what the hypothesis of the study was. The results are nightmarish.

To the Point: A Super-Deadly SARS-CoV-2 was Engineered
When the chimeric SARS-CoV-2 was tested in mice that express the same high-affinity viral entry receptor that people do, the authors dropped this bombshell…

“…while Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%.”
Yes, you read that correctly. The 23 scientists that conducted this research took a SARS-CoV-2 that is no more dangerous than the annual flu for people under 40 years of age and turned it into a virus that can kill 80% of its hosts!!!!!

To put this into perspective, nightmarish movies have been made about the horrors of outbreaks of Ebola virus, which has an average case fatality rate of 50% (as per the World Health Organization; WHO). Infamous signs of hemorrhagic fever in some people include bleeding from the eyes and other orfices.

The WHO has also reported an average case fatality rate of 50% for the deadly Marburg virus.
So, 23 scientists in the USA now have a virus in their hands that could be much more deadly than the Ebola and Marburg viruses.

Take some time to think about this.
This is appalling.

This is a classic example of gain-of-function research.
It was gain-of-function research that resulted in SARS-CoV-2 in the first place. People like U.S. senator and physician Rand Paul have essentially proved this fact. Notably, while squirming under Senator Paul’s questioning, Anthony Fauci repeatedly denied ever funding gain-of-function research, let alone with respect to SARS-CoV-2. With this in mind, note one of the key sources of funding for this current research that has generated a super-deadly SARS-CoV-2; as disclosed by the authors…

“National Institutes of Health, NIAID grants R01 AI159945 (to SB and MS) and R37 AI087846 (to MUG)”
NIAID is the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of which Anthony Fauci is the director! I am keen to see if Fauci will still declare under oath that his agency has never funded gain-of-function research related to SARS-CoV-2.

Why The ‘Monster’ SARS-CoV-2 Is Much More Dangerous
In most people, the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 typically causes only mild COVID-19, if any disease at all. This is in large part due to it being limited to infecting only the upper airways. In contrast, earlier versions of SARS-CoV-2 could infect the lower airways in some people where it could cause severe pneumonia in high-risk individuals; a demographic that has been well-defined for most of the declared pandemic.

Some scientists have been forewarning for quite some time that if a variant of SARS-CoV-2 were to emerge that had the infectivity and immunoevasive properties of Omicron, but could get deep into the lungs like earlier variants, the results could be deadly. With this in mind, here is what the authors of the pre-print article had to say about their virus…

“…unlike naturally occurring Omicron, [the chimeric SARS-CoV-2] efficiently replicates in cell lines and primary-like distal lung cells.”
…translation: the chimeric SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to cause infections deep in the lungs, where severe pneumonia would be the expected outcome. Indeed, in the mice that were killed, the virus seemed to preferentially infect the lower airways.

We may have been on our way to naturally selecting such a variant of SARS-CoV-2 through the completely inappropriate global use of COVID-19 inoculations that apply a non-lethal selective pressure. Twenty-three American scientists have inadvertently provided the proof-of-principle that emergence of a potentially deadly SARS-CoV-2 is possible. The problem is, this virus is no longer theoretical. Nor is it a potential future concern. It exists now; in laboratories in Boston.
It Gets Worse: Providing a Recipe for a Super-Pathogen

A good scientific paper should be written in such a way that other scientists in the respective field(s) of expertise could repeat the experiments to determine whether or not the results can be replicated. I am a viral immunologist and I reviewed the materials and methods section. I am confident that my research team could use this information to make the same chimeric virus. My team would never do this. However, I cannot speak to the morality of potential bioterrorists who could just as easily replicate the work should they have access to basic laboratory facilities.

In essence, the 23 authors of this paper have provided a recipe for a potent bioterrorism agent. It is in the public domain and can no longer be eliminated from cyberspace.

Remarkably, It Gets Even Worse
The naturally occurring SARS-CoV-2 is what is known as a ‘containment level-3 (CL-3) pathogen’ (Americans would call it a ‘biological safety level-3 pathogen’). This means that research with this virus must be conducted in a CL-3 facility. Such facilities have sufficient biosecurity to keep a CL-3 pathogen contained. A major potential problem with gain-of-function research is that it can amplify the danger and/or infectivity of a pathogen. This is exactly what happened in the current case.

In short, the research project started with a non-lethal SARS-CoV-2. What emerged is a virus with the potential to be a super-killer. This means that the 23 authors of the article ended up with a CL-4 pathogen housed in a CL-3 facility. The latter type of facility is not designed to contain a CL-4 pathogen!

This is an excerpt from the materials and methods section of the paper…

“All procedures were performed in a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facility at the National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories of the Boston University”

Here is how the United States Centers for Disease Control describe pathogens that must only be handled within CL-4 facilities…
“The microbes in a BSL-4 lab are dangerous and exotic, posing a high risk of aerosol-transmitted infections. Infections caused by these microbes are frequently fatal and without treatment or vaccines. Two examples of microbes worked with in a BSL-4 laboratory include Ebola and Marburg viruses.”
• Can SARS-CoV-2 be transmitted via aerosols? Yes
• Is the chimeric SARS-CoV-2 frequently fatal? Yes, 80% of the time
• Do effective treatments exist? The most effective ones have been outlawed
• Do effective vaccines exist? No. Laughable vaccine-wannabes exist, though.
• Is chimeric SARS-CoV-2 as dangerous as Ebola/Marburg viruses? Likely more so

So, should the chimeric SARS-CoV-2 have only been handled in a CL-4 facility. Yes, but, “All procedures were performed in a biosafety level 3 facility”.

If this virus were to get released into the public, it could result in a global catastrophe. Although this virus was not evaluated in humans, pre-clinical studies are used to try to predict what would happen in people. There is the theoretical potential for the virus to be less or equally deadly in people as compared to mice. However, for all we know, the virus could be even more deadly in people than it was in mice!

Action Must Be Taken Immediately: Reckless Science Must Be Stopped
1. Gain-of-function research with pathogens should be outlawed around the globe. Highly infectious viruses have no respect for borders.
2. Chimeric SARS-CoV-2, a CL-4 pathogen, was handled under CL-3 conditions. All stocks of this virus should be destroyed as soon as possible. All people who worked with this virus and their contacts should be tested via sequencing to determine if there is any evidence of this virus having been released.
3. Agencies like Fauci’s NIAID should be investigated and questioned as to why they are actively funding gain-of-function research with SARS-CoV-2, which was itself the result of gain-of-function research. The fear-mongered over-reaction to the original version of their virus massively disrupted the global population. Continuing to manipulate this virus should be investigated as potential criminal behaviour.
4. The twenty three scientists who engineered the far more dangerous SARS-CoV-2, as well as Boston University, should be investigated and their research sanctioned. They have demonstrated grossly reckless scientific behaviour.
5. Unfortunately, not much can be done about the fact that a recipe for a super-deadly SARS-CoV-2 is now in the hands of any interested bioterrorists who have read or will read the pre-print article.
Gain-of-function research does not represent the only option to study pathogenicity and infectivity of a pathogen. Even if questions arise that cannot be definitively answered in the absence of gain-of-function research, those would be questions that should be left unanswered. The risk exceeds any benefit. Science should not be practiced completely unfettered.

Evil bastards. Funded by Fauci no less.

[Risto the Great]

Oh look, the government is budgeting for vaccine injury payouts:

https://www.news.com.au/finance/econ...7a9914df7a3422

Covid vaccine injury payouts explode to $77 million, budget reveals
Payouts for Covid vaccine injuries are set to explode by more than 80 times to nearly $77 million, budget papers reveal.

Payouts for Covid-19 vaccine injuries are set to explode more than 80-fold to nearly $77 million by July next year, Tuesday’s budget papers reveal.

The figure was quietly buried in the Services Australia portfolio budget statement, in a table detailing third-party payments from the agency “on behalf of other entities”.

Services Australia administers the scheme for the Health Department.

The table reveals that in 2021-22, the Covid vaccine claims scheme paid out just $937,000 — which would work out to about 47 people if they each received the maximum tier-one amount of $20,000.

But in 2022-23, that amount is estimated to blow out to $76.9 million, equating to 3845 tier-one claims.

A spokesman for Services Australia was unable to provide any further detail on the payouts, such as the number or size of claims.

The compensation scheme, which is currently scheduled to end on April 17, 2024, allows Australians to claim up to $20,000 for medical costs, lost wages or other expenses if they suffer an adverse reaction to a Covid vaccine.

But potential applicants and legal experts have criticised it as overly complex and difficult to access, since a medical professional is required to sign off on documentation linking the reaction to the vaccine, and only a small number of officially recognised side effects such as myocarditis are covered.

Figures released earlier this month showed out of 2987 people to apply for compensation, only 59 were successful, with experts describing the rate of payouts as “absolutely pitiful”.

“With all of the hoops you’ve got to jump through, and the paperwork you’ve got to do and the medical support you’ve got to find with evidence, you’d be thinking, ‘Is it even really worth it?’” said Shine Lawyers head of medical negligence Clare Eves.

“It’s probably a lot more hassle and stress for somebody than the benefit of the other end.”

People who have suffered an eligible clinical condition or injury and can claim losses of between $1000 and $19,999 under tier one.

Tier two covers those who suffered injury or loss over $20,000.

Tier three covers vaccine recipients who died if the vaccine was proved to have caused or materially contributed to the death, and can include funeral costs.

According to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, there have been 136,523 total adverse event reports out of more than 63.8 million Covid vaccine doses as of October 16, 2022, a rate of 0.2 per cent.

The TGA has identified 14 reports where the cause of death was linked to vaccination from 939 reports received and reviewed, including one related to myocarditis after Moderna.

“Vaccination against Covid-19 is the most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from infection,” the TGA says.

“The protective benefits of vaccination far outweigh the potential risks.”

And they tried to make it mandatory. Only fools would do that to themselves and their families. I hope they are more critical in the future.

Given the ignorant and fooled population were starting to bleat about insisting the unvaccinated pay for their own medical procedures, shouldn't the vaccinated pay for this extra tax?

Further, shouldn't there be a budget for suing the vaccine manufacturers?

To think some people believed the mainstream media back when they were being subsidised by the government. Pathetic and evil.